Quantcast
Channel: Another Brick in the Wall
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 1572

Tony Pua prematurely ejaculated on Aabar BVI

$
0
0
As of tonight, Lim Kit Siang's blog team dedicated four postings with their typical paragraph long titles on the latest revelation by the IPIC announcement to the London Stock Exchange [read here, here, here and here].


They must be thinking 1MDB is cornered and the bogus company Aabar Investment PJSC Ltd (Aabar BVI) will expose Dato Najib's scam to embezzle money from 1MDB. Tony Pua was trying too hard in the PAC to corner Arul Kanda and place the blame on him.

Sarawak Report could only confirm former Aabar CEO Mohd Badawy Al-Husseiny was the signatory for the bogus BVI company and used it as the vehicle to embark in various deals with 1MDB. Arul is not wrong to just stay put and insist they have proof and dealt with the Aabar and IPIC top executives.

Tony was too overzealous to create a sensational political story that could lay the blame on Dato Najib. and subsequently, repeat the call for Najib to resign. No wonder he has yet to find the silver bullet to finish off an issue he has been dwelling on for the past two years.

His problem is premature ejaculation. Shooting off too soon.

In SR's posting dated April 14 entitled "Mohamed Badawy Al-Husseiny Was The Signatory Of Bogus Aabar Company - EXCLUSIVE!", the Ap version provided the following documents:



While, the email version added few other documents as follows:


Based on SR's given documents, which is still not subjected to any verification, it only proves that the former Aabar CEO established the bogus company. The opening line of the Ap version of SR emphasised that point.


Even the collusion with his Chairman Khadem Al Qudsi is not established. And there are many unverified claims and linked by SR.  

For Tony to try lay blame on Arul, he cannot fathom that it can be easily dispelled. All these happened during the tenure of Dato Shahrol.

Furthermore, PAC made a consensus to recommend further investigation on his conduct as CEO. Tony was a signatory to that consensus though he changed his mind upon realising he lost the political thus say he is only 80% satisfied.

The practise of PAC is for those with dissenting views to prepare a minority report. Unless he does so, he should just shut the duck up.

This would also be a turn-off for Tony.

To quote Limbang MP Hasbi Habibollah, "The PAC report finally proved that all money and funds were accounted for and all transactions have been verified. No money or funds have gone missing. It was also proven that there was no element of crime or misappropriation of funds as alleged." 

Tony's intention can be easily gauged. Sometime ago, WSJ made the following chart:


According to WSJ in which it is better not to believe Rupert Murdoch's newspaper, the allegedly funneled money via Aabar BVI ended up in Red Granite, the production house where Riza Aziz is a partner.

It is written extensively by SR that Jho Loh had a role in assisting Riza to raise financing of the award winning film, Werewolves of Wall Street.

Tony Pua is too "gelojoh" (reckless) and impatient to link it to Taek Jho Loh, Datin Seri Rosmah and her son from a previous marriage, Riza Aziz. Subsequently lay the blame on Najib and stress the demand for his resignation.

Few commentators couldn't resist the temptation of applying that same conspiracy theory and assumed our silence as stunt and cornered. All these is old story so why need to comment.

It is indicative that substantial number of Malaysians especially among the anti Najib and opposition suffer from premature ejaculation for being to presumptous, too quick and simplistic in making allegations. 


What need to be done is to prove that 1MDB under CEO Shahrol was aware of the bogus Aabar BVI company and yet still proceed to advice PM to allow remitting the money. Or more sensational is to prove that Najib is aware of this bogus company but still proceed.

As PAC concluded, it needs further investigation to establish certain facts.

Just like all the allegations against Good Star as conduit to siphon US681 million that later was alleged to appear in Najib's personal account, the facts need to be establish first as to who owns Good Star. Show the documents with the list of shareholders.  

What majority people believe or perceive is of no consequence. They may not be following the issue closely or have too many missing links in their understanding.

If the anti Najib and opposition wish to do a propaganda to promote the WSJ chart, the least they could have done was to begin with a foreplay. It needs the right level of excitement and anticipation before the exposing more sordid details.

However, if they wish to deal in the truth and justice, it is already a wee bit too long to await for them to lay out the evidences with facts and figures. With the old man still wrong in his latest RM50 billion liability instead of RM42 billion missing, only indicate they may have none.

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 1572

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>