Quantcast
Channel: Another Brick in the Wall
Viewing all 1576 articles
Browse latest View live

M'kini covering up LGE, Tony Pua interference in RM240 million tender

$
0
0

Malaysiakini undertook an investigation into the procurement of X-ray scanners worth RM240 million for the Royal Customs of Malaysia in their report, "Murky procurement of 'blacklisted' X-ray scanners".

Before commenting any further, it is noticeable that Malaysiakini got comment of denial and claim of good behaviour from Tony Pua, while the rest have not responded for various reasons, legitimate or not.

Anyone with their ears on the ground to hear the grumbling by businessmen, irrespective of race and include Chinese businessmen complaining on Tony Pua and Lim Guan Eng, they will absolutely doubt the words of Tony Pua.

There must be reasons he lost out in DAP Selangor election and got booed out at Chin Meng festival celebrations. Even in DAP's pow wow session after losing the government, Tony Pua was told to not speak as he was blamed as the cause for lost in confidence in DAP.

Talk among businessmen, particularly Chinese businessmen, is that he is the tender fixer at the Ministry of Finance.

Every proposal and tender that came into MOF will be renegotiated and even a Consulting firm based at an upmarket property were  tasked to analyse and instruct the changes that need be made to the proposals.

Those following the instruction will usually win. Talk is they will be required to deliver suitcase before any Letter of Awards are isued. It was part of raising the war chest for DAP.

Frankly the expose by M'kini could be meant to put wool over the public eye.

The fact that Tony Pua is the first to response leads the suspicion that it is covering up for DAP. If MACC jump in and start raiding the offices of the Consulting Firm, tender proposers and DAP office, wait for their drama to play victim.

The article reproduced below:       
Murky procurement of 'blacklisted' X-ray scanners 

Wong Kai Hui 
Malaysiakini 7 July 2020

Murky procurement of 'blacklisted' X-ray scanners
SPECIAL REPORT | "There was a 40-foot container full of imported potatoes, and we couldn't see what was there at that small corner. However, the scanner enabled us to discover that more than 100kg of drugs were mixed in the potatoes, and we seized the drugs. Without this facility, we simply can’t detect that."

"... Firearms, for example, a pistol, maybe hidden on the wall of the container. We can also see the shape of the firearm through the scanner. Even if you open the container to check, you can't see it at all," said then director-general of the Royal Malaysian Customs Department (RMCD) during Public Accounts Committee (PAC) hearings in 2014.

Customs inspection is the first line of defence against smuggling. Besides the constraints of human visual inspection, it’s impossible for the customs officer to inspect the containers by opening them one by one as there are thousands shipping in and out at the ports.

As such, RMCD started using X-ray scanners to detect hidden compartments and prohibited items in containers at the seaports and customs checkpoints since 20 years ago.

However, the inspection equipment which assisted humans to detect wrongdoings is now tangled with an allegation of fraud.

This came as the government planned to spend over RM240 million to buy new scanners by a China-based manufacturer, despite the government allegedly blacklisting the products after finding them to be faulty about a decade ago.

What is more intriguing is that the manufacturer, which is closely related to the so-called, China's “Princeling", has been involved in corruption cases in various countries.

Frequent error and malfunction

According to a government source, the RMCD purchased a scanner manufactured by Nuctech Co Ltd for RM12.2 million and installed it at the Klang Container Terminal (KCT) about ten years ago.

However, error and malfunctions happened frequently within a few months after installation.

The source said that according to government records, the machine had over 10 failures a month by the end of 2010, and the maintenance cost was extremely high.

An internal review, which was done by RMCD in 2011, concluded that the government should not purchase products of this brand again, if the technical problem was not properly resolved, claimed the source.

"The technology should have simplified human work, not the other way round. The recorded failure was just the tip of the iceberg. According to the personnel who were in charge, the failures occurred almost every day."

The government source pointed out that one of the recorded problems was that the machine could not scan and record car plate numbers and container numbers accurately.



"If it involves any court case, this problem may have undesirable consequences. The images displayed and recorded on the screens can be used as evidence in court, but the court case may be dismissed due to this technical error.”

"In order to deal with this, the officer in charge needs to manually write down the car plate and container numbers before the vehicle carrying the container enters the scanner."

The cargo scanners are usually installed outdoors and should be waterproof. However, the source revealed that the scanner had malfunctioned due to the infiltration of rainwater even before the warranty period expired.

It cost nearly RM200,000 per month for maintenance of two scanners of this brand, which cost nearly ten times higher than other scanners in the same port, claimed the source.

Frequent failure mentioned in PAC report

The Auditor-General Report of 2013 (Series2) highlighted the problem and the PAC summoned RMCD to review the matter in the following year.

During the PAC hearings, the representative of the National Audit Department (NAD) had named Nuctech and pointed out the frequent failure of its products.

According to the Hansard of PAC hearings, the investigation by NAD found that the downtime of Nuctech scanners, which were installed in the Klang Port, North Port, and West Port, was over 160 days in a year, and at times even as high as 214 days.

Generally speaking, when a scanner fails to operate, the customs officer still has the right to request the container to be opened for inspection. However, some smuggling activities are very difficult to detect with the naked eye.

The government did not rule out that the customs officers may not be thoroughly inspecting due to fatigue or laziness, replied the NAD officer during the PAC hearings.

In January 2018, RMCD issued a letter to terminate the maintenance service of Malaysia-based company Nuctech Engineering & Services Sdn Bhd. Malaysiakini has sighted the letter and contacted RMCD for clarification.

Malaysiakini learned that Nuctech Engineering & Services Sdn Bhd was renamed Nes Scan Sdn Bhd in October 2017.


In 2018, then finance minister Lim Guan Eng (photo) announced that the Pakatan Harapan government decided to purchase 20 cargo scanners in order to enhance the prevention of smuggling and illegal declarations, thereby increasing tax revenue.

The PAC report in 2014 recorded that during the ten years between 2001 and 2011, the BN government purchased a total of 16 cargo scanners worth RM183 million.

In other words, the purchase of 20 scanners by the Harapan government can be said to be a very large-scale procurement.

Intriguingly, the lease-purchase tender has been cancelled and re-tendered twice without clear reasons given, according to a source in the industry.

Turning a big circle, the government might eventually spend over RM240 million to purchase the same product again, which was found to be faulty about 10 years ago.

The tender was announced for the first time at the end of 2018. In October 2019, Lim revealed that the government planned to allocate RM235 million to purchase the 20 scanners when he announced the 2020 Budget.

The tender information issued by the Finance Ministry (MOF) indicated the scanners will be installed at various ports in Selangor, Johor, Penang, Perlis, Kedah, Sabah, and Sarawak.

The project was divided into two packages - one was for 13 scanners in the Peninsular, and the second was for seven scanners in Sabah and Sarawak.

The first tender was scheduled to close in January 2019, but it was cancelled and then restarted twice.

The notices for the second and third tender were published on the MOF website in April 2019 and August 2019 respectively, and the final result of the tender was announced in January 2020.

The announcement of the tender result was only accessible for companies in related industries in the government electronic procurement system “e-Perolehan”.


A source in the industry told Malaysiakini that PTS Resources Sdn Bhd won the contract for 13 scanners in the Peninsular, with a total value of approximately RM147.04 million, while Infomina Sdn Bhd was awarded the contract for seven scanners in Sabah and Sarawak, with a total value of approximately RM95.2 million.

PTS Resources is registered as a supplier of industrial and electrical equipment, spare parts, as well as commissioning works. According to the company website, it specialises in the oil, gas, and petrochemical industries, with no experience in cargo inspection systems.

As for Infomina, it was registered as a company that provides maintenance and support services for information technology. Its official website shows that it is an IT company, mainly providing building automation, communication, green energy, information, and physical security systems including CCTV surveillance, access control, and perimeter detection.

The total value of the two packages was RM242.24 million, which is an extra RM7.24 million if compared to the RM235 million budget previously announced.

According to a tender document sighted by Malaysiakini, 12 of the 20 scanners will be newly installed while the remaining eight will be used to replace existing scanners, which include several scanners manufactured by Nuctech.

Since the tender does not allow foreign companies to participate directly, they would normally appoint local companies to do it instead.

Even when the contract-winning companies were announced, the brands proposed by the winning companies are not disclosed to the public.

The industry source claimed that the seven scanners proposed by Infomina, to be installed in Sabah and Sarawak, were actually Nuctech's products.

Malaysiakini has also called Nuctech’s Beijing headquarters office to seek confirmation and respond to the allegations. The company responded that the media only need to contact their local partners for any enquiry.

When contacted, Infomina refused to confirm the product brand and model, citing a non-disclosure agreement with the government. Malaysiakini was asked to seek clarification from the government instead.

MOF and RMCD did not respond to Malaysiakini's request for confirmation and clarification.

Changing the brand after winning the contract?

According to the source, after the contracts were awarded, a more puzzling situation occurred.

PTS Resources, which was authorised by another China-based manufacturer CGN Begood Technology Co Ltd, which won the contract for the Peninsula, allegedly issued a letter to the government to request to change the proposed brand to Nuctech.

"PTS Resources has sent a letter to RMCD or MOF after they found that they were unable to deliver the 13 scanners, and they requested to be replace them with Nuctech products," claimed the source.

In short, even though the Harapan government changed the culture of "direct negotiation" in the BN era, the government may eventually purchase products of questionable quality after a tendering process that took almost a year.

PTS Resources confirmed with Malaysiakini that it was awarded the contract for the Peninsular package. However, it refused to comment on the request to change the brand, the reasons for such a request, and if the government had approved it.

Similarly, PTS Resources cited a non-disclosure agreement with the government, and Malaysiakini was asked to seek clarification directly from the government.

Malaysiakini has contacted RMCD director-general Abdul Latif Abdul Kadir and the deputy director of the Procurement Department, Mohd Faizal Mansor, to clarify on the above allegations.


Involved in corruption cases

Nuctech Co Ltd is a subsidiary of Tsinghua Holdings founded in 1997. It was headed by Hu Haifeng, the son of the former China president Hu Jintao, until 2008.

He resigned from Nuctech in 2008 and later joined Tsinghua Holdings and was also promoted as the Communist Party secretary.

According to some monographs, the company made great strides internationally and successfully entered the African market after Hu joined. Their security equipment was sold to various countries such as Macedonia, Philippines, Ireland, and the United Kingdom.

However, Nuctech was also involved in corruption cases in many countries, not too long after that.

The Telegraph reported that Nuctech was involved in a multi-million procurement scandal in Namibia, which was probed by the Namibian Anti-Corruption Commission. Hu assisted the investigation as a "witness" in 2009.

The Namibian reported that three individuals were prosecuted in this case - namely a Nuctech Africa representative Yang Fan, Namibia’s former Public Service Commission member Teckla Lameck, and a representative of Nuctech’s local partners Kongo Mokaxwa.

The prosecution alleged that the scanner price was inflated to enable Nuctech to pay a multi-million “commission” to a party linked to Lameck and Mokaxwa.

The accused first went on trial in 2013, but the case ended halfway as the judge had to step down from continuing to hear the matter, according to The Namibian.

The trio was reportedly acquitted in 2019 after the prosecution conceded that the state did not manage to present sufficient evidence.

Additionally, in Taiwan, it was reported that the former head of the Aviation Police Bureau’s aviation security section, Sun Yi-Ming, was convicted in February 2020 for receiving kickbacks and engaging in other illicit activities.

Nuctech X-ray scanners which were purchased by Taiwanese authorities and installed at airports were found to have been repackaged in Japan to deceive Taiwanese regulators. Sun was also found to be lured by a female sales manager from Nuctech, according to Taipei Times.

A separate fraud case involving Nuctech happened in the Philippines.

ABS-CBN reported that the Philippine government purchased 30 X-ray scanners from Nuctech through a loan agreement with the Chinese government.

However, the Philippine’s Commission on Audit subsequently found that the machines were exorbitantly overpriced by 4.215 billion Philippine pesos (about RM360 million).

It was reported that the quality of Nuctech’s scanners was questionable as they had zero detection of methamphetamine or other drugs for ten years, despite its maintenance cost being 1.5 times higher than other international service providers.

Looking back to Malaysia, the integrity of the tender process was also questionable. Calling for a thorough investigation, the source who spoke to Malaysiakini had also notified the MACC in early June 2020.

This news portal has contacted MACC for a response.

Tony Pua, as the former political secretary to Lim, responded that all things were done in compliance with open tender and MOF procedures.

He also claimed that the awarding of contracts followed the recommendation of the evaluation committee, which consisted of the chief secretary and senior officials of the MOF and RMCD.
The article is noticeably putting pressure on the various authorities and ensure "they" still get the contract.

Compliance as Tony Pua claim it usually is, but the recommendations and committee membership can be fixed and swayed by political pressure.

One must remember that from the first day on the job, Tony Pua would utter insults to the effect calling "Melayu bodoh" in the first staff meeting.

The harassment continues at every opportunity with threat in the form of repeated wild accusations and practically tell off civil servants that they are in power thus you cannot do anything to us. During meetings, they speak Chinese among themselves.

The message is made louder by placing all DAP political appointments at the Minister level office and civil servants are placed at the lower floors.     

On this tender, sources said those participating in the tender were amazed as to why the tender had to be done three times. Malaysiakini did not mentioned it. A source said those that came top five several times and one came top three were not shortlisted.

Not sure whether it is true and rather hard to believe, but it was speculated that a company linked to Tan Sri Vincent Tan did not participated in the tender but were later short listed.

With confidence, this cock up in the tender arise due to as the tipper from within MOF texted, "Another recently failed custom project ...but this one due to interference from MOF/tokong Guan Eng and Tony Pua".

Both of them partners to AMANAH would look cool in orange.



Preserving UMNO is a priority

$
0
0

The motion to remove House Speaker, Tan Sri Mohd Ariff Mohd Yusof yesterday won by a slim 111 against 109. Ariff accepted the decision as "he who appoints has the power to remove". It is customary for ruling party to put their own man.

There are voices playing down the house decision as not surpassing the 112 majority, but in his victory over Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah in the 1987 UMNO party election, it was Tun Dr Mahathir who said "A win by one is still a win".

The slim win does put into question the fragile state of the "Perikatan Nasional", the upcoming agenda #27 on vote of no confidence, and even calls for an immediate snap general election to follow Singapore.

There is growing fear that the economic fallout from Corona Covid 19 pandemic will worsen next year. Government need a fresh mandate to face it. PAP lost 10 seats to Worker's party over the weekend.

Since the endorsement of Tan Sri Muhyiddin as PM candidate for GE15 in the meeting of PN leaders prior to parliament, social media debated on UMNO's endorsement have been lively - for and against such move.

At the party leadership level, the decision to be made is not singular in purpose since at the crossroad of its existence, UMNO need to ponder hard on the future ramification.

The long and short of it, the preservation of UMNO should be the highest priority to all level within and without the the party.

Current politics


Certain faction strongly believe that UMNO should have offered their list of candidate to include the renewed popular Dato Mohd Najib Tun Abdul Razak, instead of endorsing Muhyiddin. On the other hand, the political realist felt the endorsement was necessary.

That led to further discussion on UMNO's participation in PN and Muafakat Nasional. Tan Sri Shahrir Samad, Dato Nur Jazlan Mohamed, Dato Khaled Nordin and Dato Dr Puad Zarkashi are among the vocal ones.

Their views may have touched on PPBM and lead to reactions from leaders Wan Saiful, Tan Sri Rais Yatim, Dato Dr Latif Ahmad and Armada leader from Perak. 

Though statements from UMNO and PAS leaders seem to indicate all systems go with PN, talk is both are not comfortable with the idea championed by Dato Hamzah Zainuddin to register PN.

UMNO has its Barisan Nasional coalition and PAS its coalition in Gagasan Sejahtera. MN is the apex coalition that ties it all. Seat allocation discussion have been on-going and almost consummated. To include PPBM and more so, Azmin's former PKR faction, it complicates the set arrangement.   

There are the questions of sincerity on the part of Muhyiddin, and sly moves of Tun Dr Mahathir, including the independent pact with Warisan that raise suspicion to systematically weaken UMNO.

Within UMNO, there are sceptics suspicious of Azmin's political manouvering, entry of Gerakan into PN, and even the existing understanding with PAS.

All these require a formula to begin discussion as it is still a long way from sorting out the kinks.

For one, Muhyiddin need to feel comfortable with his position and role of the seized down PPBM before he dare seek a fresh mandate to strengthen and stabilise PN.

It is politically interesting that Najib-friendly politicians such Dato Nazri Aziz and Dato Tajuddin Rahman started laying the ground for Muhyiddin to return to UMNO with invitation and suggestion to take up UMNO Presidency.

Whether it is a bait or out of sincerity for Malay unity, it needs the concurrence of UMNO President, Dato Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, and the possibility of BossKu making a political comeback should he be acquited in the SRC court decision on July 28th.

A Najib win limits Muhyiddin's option.

UMNO has other aspirants for the top party positions in the likes of Dato Mohamed Hassan, Dato Hishamuddin Tun Hussein Onn, Dato Ismail Sabri, Tan Sri Annuar Musa and many others.   

Which ever way the party leadership or influential personalities move the party forward, foremost in their mind, considerations and priorities must be to preserve UMNO as the dominant political party to represent the Malays and extends to the Orang Asli and various Pribumi of Sabah and Sarawak.

Preserving UMNO


There are several rationale on the need to preserve UMNO.

For one, it is the political party with the largest membership, widest network and represent the majority indigenous people of the country. Breaking it up will disunite the Malays, and weaken the nation by opening it up to destabilising elements.

PAS is the second largest Malay Muslim political party and the late Tun Abdul Razak acknowledge its presence to say, "When UMNO fails, the Malay must support PAS".

UMNO translate to national stability and it is the historical umbilical cord for continuity to link the past to the present and moving forward to the future. The moment UMNO lost power country was in disarray.

For peace, stability and prosperity of the country, the traditional Malay character of the country and Islamic tradition of ahlil sunnah wal jamaah should be strongly upheld as it provides the base for tolerance and acceptance to the existence of other races and faiths.

The best vehicle to preserve the inherited culture, tradition and practises of Malay and Muslims lies with preserving UMNO. Other political parties were at one period or another compromised by multiculturalism, liberalism, and imported political ideologies and doctrines.

UMNO had been the bastion of Malay politics. All major political parties in Malaysia has its origin and linked to UMNO history. PAS came from the breakaway group from UMNO's first general assembly in Muar. So was Parti Negara, Semangat 46 and PKR. 

From the administrative and leadership standpoint, the long period of growth and prosperity came with UMNO at the helm of national leadership. The bulk of Malay talents and experience to provide the administrative support and leadership to the government machinery remains from UMNO.

PAS have emerging leadership talents, but it is still not numerically sufficient and experience wise to fulfill the positions at national level.

The experience of 22 months of PH leadership was a sample of PAS leadership talent in the form of Amanah. PAS need to be nurtured and elevated from state level leadership.

The return of PAS into a coalition of UMNO will elevate them from their check and balance role as opposition to complimentary role to their former partner in the early 1970s BN coalition.

The name Perikatan and Nasional signify the UMNO transition from Perikatan to BN.

Systematic destruction of Malay


As happened to the Incas by Spanish colonialist, the strategy of every colonialist is to economically marginalise and subsequently socially and politically weaken the original inhabitants of any land.

In addition, the would dismantle the social, economic and political system to meet their colonial capitalist purpose.

The European colonial master of Malaya and the Borneo states did that by bringing cheap immigrant labour to work for them. When Malaya and subsequently Sabah and Sarawak received its "independence", the immigrants they left behind became a time bomb that could implode to destabilise the nation.

The experience of GE 12, 13 and 14 saw the infusion of foreign backed subversive elements manipulating, instigating and igniting divisions within society by imploding on the time bomb left by the colonial masters, and creating ideological and sectarian divisions within the Malay Muslim community and country at large.

The fronts of their attack were to secularise the country away from Islam, reduce role of monarchy towards a republic, abolish Bumiputera status, abolish the syariah legal system and introduce human rights over god's right as the new norm on all aspect of life.     

It was done through other Muslim fringe groups promoting syiah, wahabism, liberal Islam, murtads, and other anti-ahlil sunnah wal jamaah ideologies and practices, revival of communist/socialist ideology, Chinese and Indian chauvanism as promoted by DAP and PKR, Zionist Christian through new age church evangelism, and liberal world order NGOs. 

In all aspects, Mahathir and his family members participated by deception and now openly to destroy the Malay Muslims socially, economically and politically over a span of 50 years.

The fall of BN was god's blessing and an eye opener for PAS to embrace its old political competitor and partner for the sake of the Malay Muslims unity and national stability.

It maybe seen as old school or repeating old cliche to the new voters, but it is imperative on the survival of the Malay Muslim community from these various threats to preserve UMNO and maintain its dominant roles.

To achieve the acceptance of the community, UMNO itself has to undertake its own self rejuvenation to emulate PAS by bringing up new leaders and do away with the old warlords. The leaders must voluntarily prepare a succession plan that is not self serving and execute it.

UMNO members must discard the dependent mentality and insensible idolising of leaders. They should adopt the attitude that leaders come and go, but UMNO must move on. It need to shed the culture of idolising leaders from Mahathir era that led to its self destruction.

UMNO should take up the leadership to encourage positive politics and attract the millions of Malays that have yet to register as voters and participate in the political process.

Zahid Hamidi


It is speculated that Zahid Hamidi may be facing a leadership challenge in the upcoming party election, but undoubtedly, his role during the most trying times of UMNO's more than 60 years existence should be given high regards.

He managed to steer UMNO out of the most challenging phase it ever undergone despite the personal criticism and legal threat made against him.

Recently, it was wise of him to remind and urge members not to emulate the PH bad habits to quarrel over the PM position that subsequently led to their lost of power.

Zahid's willingness to participate in the Sheraton move initiated by others, which superceded the authority of the President, was a selfless act.

He took priority to save the Malays, Bumiputera and Malaysians at large from the cruel and ruthless policies of DAP controlled administration than his personal ego.

His commendable sacrifice should be emulated by other UMNO old leaders to pass the baton peacefully and willingly. Mahathir may still be around in Parliament but he too has lost it. The world has changed dramatically due to technology and more so post pandemic.   

Country need new leaders with new ideas, and new visions willing to embrace the new paradigm while at the same time, preserve the cultural tradition and heritage.

Zahid's current challenge will be to preserve UMNO and gather the leaders to be purposeful in its mindset, actions and position.

The pillar of UMNO strength and always the unsung heroine is Wanita. It needs to be guided and reignite to its past glories and strength under the new phase of leadership.

The youth wings must be revived into an active and vibrant organisation with vigour and strength.

New blood is needed and UMNO must make itself appealing.

Complacency, reckless politics could hasten Sabah as China's 24th province

$
0
0

Al Jazeera reported:
On Monday, the US raised the stakes, saying "Beijing's claims to offshore resources" across most of the disputed seas were "completely unlawful". US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo added that the world would "not allow Beijing to treat the South China Sea as its maritime empire."
The title of an opinion piece in the South China Morning Post, The US is finally taking sides in the South China Sea – against Beijing’s claims, sums up Pompeo's statement.

Earlier on July 6th, US conducted a military exercise at the South China Sea. The position taken by US indicate their interest to participate in the dispute.

The cowboy manner of US intervention in international disputes is not something countries in the region should look forward as it usually flare-up into a full blown war.

Malaysia have been looking to other options to avoid the possibility of superpowers doing battle at its doorstep.

Foreign Minister, Dato Hishamuddin Hussein tried to cool temperature by playing down media attention to the rising dispute with claims no Chinese ships sighted in Malaysian water for 100 days.

Rebuked


It is not sufficiently comforting as it confirmed Chinese regular intrusions.

His statement was rebuked in the twitter of Greg Polling, a Senior Fellow of SoutheastAsiaDC, who claimed Chinese have been patrolling into Malaysian water every single day. He referred to Hishamuddin's denial as reported by MMO here.

Backing the twitter, the Auditor General report 2018 claimed that there have been 89 incursion by Chinese ships in Malaysian waters between 2016 to 2019. The report highlighted a lack of coordination between enforcement departments and agencies.

The former defense Minister's reply was strongly rebuked by former Foreign Minister, Dato Anifah Aman as being in-denial or ignorant.

For Sabahans, China's daily presence near their waters and millitary bases on several man-made island in the shoals of the South China Sea are too close for comfort.

Malaysian public's current concerns are the Corona Covid-19 pandemic health issues, restarting life and economy after the lockdown, and politically fragile government.

The bigger concern should be the intrusion could eventually deny us of our own fossil resources and escalate into international conflict.

Malaysia's relation with China face the dilemma arising from their false 9th dash line claims. However, there is no mileage to gain with a strong stance against its most important trading partner, wrote Tan Siew Mun in MMO here on July 16th 2016

Peaceful settlement


Hishamuddin's conciliatory statements was obviously intended to allay fear and panic to the public.

He immediately responded to Anifah with a plea for peaceful settlement but with the wishful hope China will respect international law and conventions.

US's recent tough stance need to bring  about an immediate change in attitude on the Chinese part to avoid the situation from escalating further.

SCMP reported a Hainan based researcher called on Beijing to assess its strategies for South China Seas in relation to Washington. One can only hope for it to happen. When superpowers set their eyes on a certain interest, they do not waver.

China ignored decision by a tribunal at The Hague arising from a suit brought by the Philippines in 2016. The ruling rejected China's “historic title” over the waters.

The 9 dash line was superseded by the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. China's own record dispute their claim of historic rights.

China have been making increasing military presence in the South China Sea. God forbid Sabah could be turned into the 24th province of China overnight.

China's next province


UMNO Tuaran Division Chief, Dato Abdul Rahman Dahlan recently enlisted a series of investments from China totalling more than RM50 billion announced by Chief Minister, Dato Shafie Apdal.

He was questioning the failure of previous announcements by Shafie and wasted Yayasan Sabah land worth hundreds of million.

The bigger concern would be Shafie's enthusiasm to bring Chinese investment may pose a security threat with their increase presence in Sabah. If he received bribes, China could dictate him.

In his attempt to save Shafie's position as Chief Minister and Warisan as the state's ruling party, Tun Dr Mahathir pulled off a stunt to propose him as the 9th Prime Minister of Malaysia.

It boost support from within PH coalition. However, the fear is instead of moving to Kuala Lumpur, Shafie may only end up Governor of a Chinese province and making regular trips to Beijing to only take orders without question.

Sabahans and its politicians have been uttering threats of leaving Malaysia. Their dream may come true with Shafie.

Eye on the ball


Hishamuddin would not want that to happen under his watch at Wisma Putra.

He has to move his attention away from political monuvering to let UMNO President do his job and focus on the delicate state of Malaysia's threatened sovereignty to a superpower and authoritarian regime.

Anifah statement is a wake up call on Hishamuddin to keep his eyes on the ball, and maintain a firm and clear on Malaysia's position on South China Sea. One cannot perpetually have the cake and eat it too.

His statement as follows:
Press Statement by YBhg Datuk Seri Panglima Anifah Haji Aman on the Recent News Reports Quoting That There Was No Further Enroachment By Chinese Vessels into Malaysia's Maritime Areas in the South China Sea and cara bagaimana kita lakukannya, is between us and the leadership in China”.

I read with great interest the many news reports that the Minister of Foreign Affairs, YB Dato’ Seri Hishammuddin Tun Hussien had stated on 15 July 2020 that since he took over as the Foreign Minister of Malaysia, there was no further encroachment by Chinese vessels into Malaysia’s maritime areas in the South China Sea, and “cara bagaimana kita lakukannya, is between us and the leadership in China”.

I am appalled by the Minister’s statement. He is either in denial or ignorant of the fact. Worst, he is playing politics with Malaysia’s maritime and strategic interests.

It was only in April that a flotilla of Chinese enforcement vessels was sighted accompanying a Chinese survey vessel within Malaysia maritime areas. Further, I was reliably informed that Chinese coast guard vessels were sighted in the vicinity of Beting Patinggi Ali in May, June and July.

As a country that legitimately owns maritime areas in the South China Sea, the Government should not be hesitant to categorically state its objection to any unauthorised activities by foreign vessels within its maritime areas. If the Ministry of Foreign Affairs finds it appropriate to issue statement on 25  June and 12 July on the drone and missile attacks towards the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, surely it would not be too much to expect the Ministry to at least summon the Ambassador of the People’s Republic of China to register Malaysia’s displeasure on the unauthorised activities by the Chinese coast guard vessels within Malaysia’s maritime areas in the South China Sea.

Malaysia has never recognised China’s claims over its maritime areas in the South China Sea and the Government must uphold the position to ensure Malaysia’s maritime and strategic interests are not jeopardised. Failing to do so is a great disservice to the nation.

Being firm in safeguarding, protecting and promoting Malaysia’s maritime and strategic interests does not mean we need to be confrontational. What we need to do is to ensure full respect for legal and diplomatic processes, and uphold the supremacy of the rule of law in accordance with international law and the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.

As I have stated many times, we must not be indecisive in defending our rights and interests, and a consistent principled position would stand us in good stead for the long term.

DATO’ SERI PANGLIMA ANIFAH HAJI AMAN
16 July 2020
By the way, foreign affairs matter is best dealt at Wisma Putera in Putrajaya and by building international relations through developing personal relations.

Tabung Haji: Baling's day in Parliament

$
0
0


On Tuesday July 21st, 2020, former Chairman of Lembaga Tabung Haji (TH), and MP for Baling, Dato Seri Azeez Rahim got his day in Parliament to spill out and answer the two years of accusation towards him by Pakatan Harapan on TH.

According to viraled poster, the Mufti of Perlis passed a slanderous comment against Azeez following police report made at the end of 2018.

Parit Buntar MP, Dr Mujahid denied Azeez the chance to pose a question, when he had the floor. Mujahid  repeated Kulim Bandar Baharu MP, Dato Saifuddin Nasution who earlier spoke the same point on liability level below asset and riding on the name of PWC.

Both were given leeway by Port Dickson MP, Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim, who was rhetorical and lack specifics to debate on TH. They were reiterating past debunked arguments to divert the long list of shortcomings and infringements done by PH administered TH.

This blog sensed the concerted effort to dismantle TH from its January 2017 posting against Rafizi Ramli. The anticipated ill intentions on TH as mentioned by this FB here have come to being and no more to be denied. By December 2018, the focus is on the Architect of the destruction, Dato Zaiton Hassan.

The time of 20 minutes was insufficient for Azeez to finish delivering his prepared speech. He was interjected by Langkawi MP, Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamed, and tactically interupted by Simpang Renggam MP, Dr Maszlee Malek.


Despite having to brush aside Maszlee's attempt, Azeez managed to raise issues on the unaudited, but announced hibah for TH's 2018 and 2019 accounts, SPV, Urusharta Jemaah Sdn Bhd (UJSB), underpriced sales of assets done in a hurry, and demanded on PN government to call for an Royal Commission on Inquery (RCI).

He followed up to elaborate further his Parliament speech on UMNO Online here in a 1 hour 14 minute interview:



Azeez touched quite a few of the points in our posting here to call for the sacking of the Boards of Directors. For manipulating account and announcing illegal hibah, the law require them to be sacked!

There are still issues not touched yet. He is planning to do a nationwide roadshow.

Tabung Haji became a hot dicussion in the current Parliament proceeding, which overshadowed the pre-Parliament attention on the change of Speaker and Vote of No Confidence.

First salvo 

The first salvo towards PH on the TH issue was initially done by Pontian MP, Dato Ahmad Maslan:


Ahmad Maslan highlighted the weakness of the UJSB as the SPV:


And, despite attempt to disrupt elaboration of the UJSB and sales of TH Plantation, Ahmad Maslan  bulldozed through and called for an RCI to be formed.


RCI

The first to reiterate the call for RCI was Dato Dr Asyraf Wajidi:


Asyraf has started a series of video to explain the TH issues:



Mujahid has sold off TH asset done through UJSB but tried to deceive the public as though it was not sold but transfered:


And, Mujahid tried to deceive the public with a naughty question with an expected answer and suspected collaboration with his planted staff at the Prime Minister's Department on Islamic affairs.



Tan Sri Muhyiddin was sucked in to reiterate the answer given by Minister Dato Dr Dzulkifli Al Bakri.


The former Mufti of Federal Territory is increasingly suspected of collaborating with Mujahid and Amanah politicians and activists.

Sales suspended

Watch Asyraff FB page here for more update. The latest is a video of the Deputy Minister to Dr Dzul responded to admit the asset sales were inappropriately made:


The sales of the hotels and plantation were made at unrealistic valuation and done at a time, oil palm prices is at artificially rock bottom price due to "intentionally" strained relation with major buyers.


And, PM must insist to remove the current member of the Board and if any had been extended, TH deserve the right to terminate any time.


All staff that were unfairly suspended for 603 days must be reinstated to their previous positions immediately!

If the RCI not called, Board of Directors and CEO maintained, no remedial action to revive TH, and reinstatement of the staff are not made, PH's political liability from TH will turn around to be Tan Sri Muhyiddin's political liability.

He will be perceived as defending PH's intentionally planned destruction of TH.

Could Justice Nazlan's SRC verdict be free from politics?

$
0
0

To most Malaysians, politics interfere in every aspect of Malaysian life including in the court of justice.

More so,  Tun Dr Mahathir had no respect for the law and had the reputation of interfering in the judiciary. This time using Dato Gopal Sri Ram.

Dato Nazlan Ghazali was aware his reputation was tarnished by Gopal's claim to members of the legal community that Nazlan was "his boy". Apparently, he is not the only victim of Gopal's manipulative and bully tactics to impose himself on other judges and lawyers.

Tan Sri Apandi Ali revealed on his FB in mid-June of Gopal Sri Ram "sent to see him in January 2018 by Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad to persuade him to arrest Najib, the then prime minister".

Gopal kept silent and only responded three weeks later to brushed it off as self corroboration and meant to frustrate his 1MDB trial. Apandi said he has proofs and responded with a 59 page affidavit. No reply from Gopal yet.

Be that as it may. It is undeniably an indication that politics could influence the outcome of the SRC case.

As one retired intelligence officer said, "The judges and lawyers will deny but politics will be a consideration case in any big cases such as this".

So far, no evidence indicate Tan Sri Muhyiddin's interference. He has no one to do it. Nevertheless, a guilty verdict will clear the political logjam and uncertainty for the ruling coalition.

Nazlan to deliver verdict 

Justice Nazlan was given a major case that attracted world attention for his first assignment as criminal judge. One popular FB notice he was assigned few more of Mahathir's series of political persecution cases.

And, he made a controversial verdict to release two DAP ADUNs suspected of involvement in LTTE based on the argument SOSMA law used was unconstitutional. It made curious minds wonder ever since.

While all eyes are on Najib, and its implication on Malaysian politics and GE15, the legal community will be watching the judge, who whisperings in the halls of justice are saying he is a Federal Court judge in the making.

Free Malaysia Today reported:
All attention on Najib’s corruption trial as judge delivers verdict on Tuesday

V Anbalagan - July 26, 2020 1:40 PM

Najib Razak is the first former prime minister to be charged with a criminal offence.

KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysia will be the focal point on Tuesday when High Court judge Mohd Nazlan Mohd Ghazali delivers his verdict in Najib Razak’s trial on the RM42 million corruption charges relating to SRC International Sdn Bhd.

Najib, 67, is the first former prime minister to be charged for a criminal offence. He gave evidence under oath for about 10 days to rebut the prosecution’s case.

Najib, who is Pekan MP, will be acquitted if Nazlan finds the defence has created a doubt in the prosecution’s case.

The judge will convict Najib in the event he finds the prosecution has proved its case beyond reasonable doubt.

V Sithambaram
Once found guilty, Najib’s status changes from innocent person to a convict, and the right to bail pending appeal is not automatic as he has to show special circumstances.

This was also in the case of Anwar Ibrahim who was found guilty of abuse of power and sodomy by the High Court about 20 years.

He failed in the Court of Appeal and the Federal Court to get bail.

Najib could remain MP should he file an appeal on conviction and sentence as the Federal Constitution provides for such circumstances.

However, he has to settle the fine imposed by the court.

Shafee Abdullah
Najib, 67, was ordered to enter his defence in November to charges of abusing his power as prime minister by giving government guarantees on a RM4 billion loan from Retirement Fund Incorporated to SRC International.

This offence carries a jail term of up to 20 years and a fine of not less than five times the RM42 million amount under the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act.

Najib, is also facing three charges of misappropriating RM42 million of SRC International funds.

Each offence under Section 409 of the Penal Code carries a maximum jail term of up to 20 years, whipping and a fine.

He is also facing three counts of money laundering charges for receiving RM42 million which were proceeds from unlawful activities, with the offences punishable under the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act (AMLATFPUAA) 2001. 
It provides a maximum 15 years’ jail, and a fine of five times the RM42 million.

All offences were allegedly committed at the Prime Minister’s Office in Putrajaya and at AmIslamic Bank Bhd here between 2011 and 2015.

The defence has taken the position that there was no abuse of power as Najib’s participation in the decision-making process at Cabinet meetings was above board.

Further, it contended, there was no misappropriation of RM42 million of SRC money as the amount that entered into his account was part of a donation from the Arab royal family.

The defence also contends the money laundering charges would be dropped if the court rules Najib had been cleared of any wrongdoing for abuse of power and criminal breach of trust.

The 91-day trial began on April 3 last year. The prosecution called 57 witnesses to try to establish a prima facie case against Najib. The defence closed its case on March 11 after calling 19 witnesses.

Ad-hoc prosecutor V Sithambaram led the prosecution team while counsel Muhammad Shafee Abdullah and Harvinderjit Singh were the defence lawyers.
Political equation

The judgement could determine Najib's political career whether he could make a comeback or failing which, he may not even run in Pekan for the upcoming GE15. South China Morning Post columnist analysed:
Will verdict in Najib’s first 1MDB trial trip up Malaysia snap election contenders?
  • A guilty verdict on Tuesday would end former PM Najib Razak’s campaign to rehabilitate his image and make a bid for his old job, says an analyst
  • A not guilty ruling may strengthen the formerly ruling Umno party, but that may not be good news for PM Muhyiddin Yassin
Bhavan Jaipragas and Tashny Sukumaran
Published: 9:30am, 26 Jul, 2020

Former Malaysian prime minister Najib Razak will hear the verdict in his trial, involving seven of the 42 criminal charges he is facing over his alleged role in the looting of Malaysia’s 1MDB state fund. Photo: AP

A Malaysian court will on Tuesday hand down the verdict for the first of former prime minister Najib Razak’s five criminal trials linked to the 1MDB financial scandal, and observers say the ruling is likely to have far-reaching consequences not just for his personal future, but for the country’s tumultuous politics as well.

With Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin – propped up currently by Najib’s powerful United Malays National Organisation (Umno) – expected to trigger snap elections soon, the outcome of Najib’s legal troubles could weigh on the poll results.

Media reports have suggested the election could be called by year’s end to help the ruling Perikatan Nasional bloc shore up its two-seat parliamentary majority.

It is not yet certain if Muhyiddin – who is not an Umno member – will be the prime ministerial candidate for the ruling camp if polls are called. Instead, talk has been swirling that Najib, prime minister from 2009 to 2018, could make a shock comeback.

The Kuala Lumpur Courts Complex, where Najib has been on trial. Photo: Bloomberg

A guilty verdict would “terminate [Najib’s] ongoing campaign since the May 2018 general election to rehabilitate his image and make a second leadership bid” to return as prime minister, said Harrison Cheng, a Malaysia watcher with the Control Risks consultancy.

If he is found not guilty, analysts say the veteran politician’s current political resurgence will continue in the lead up to the general election, which will pit him against now-ousted political rivals – including elder statesman Mahathir Mohamad – who initiated the cases against him after their victory in 2018’s general election.

In the event of a not-guilty verdict and if “Najib somehow returns to helm Umno without dividing the party, then it’s likely that Umno will emerge as the dominant party from the general election”, Cheng said. In that scenario, “Najib will probably repeat Mahathir’s feat of becoming prime minister twice in his career”, the Singapore-based analyst said.

Other observers told This Week in Asia they would be closely monitoring public reaction to the ruling, adding that no matter the outcome, the judgment will worsen the country’s political polarisation.

Political scientist Awang Azman Awang Pawi said that for Najib’s Umno, an acquittal will vindicate their argument that his legal travails were a witch-hunt by Mahathir’s camp.

“For conservative voters, they see this as evidence Najib is innocent and persecuted politically. All this will strengthen the conservative vote in support of Umno and Perikatan Nasional,” said Awang Azman.

Malaysian Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin, who assumed office in March. Photo: DPA

On the other hand, supporters of Umno’s key opponents Mahathir and on-off ally Anwar Ibrahim, are likely to view an exoneration of the former leader as a “travesty of justice”, said Azmil Tayeb, a political science lecturer at the Universiti Sains Malaysia. This, he said, could in turn spur the currently disparate bloc to once again gel together to take on Najib and his formidable allies – as they successfully did in 2018.

Unprecedented political turmoil in March saw the multiracial Pakatan Harapan government that toppled Najib on an anti-corruption campaign turfed out of power.

Muhyiddin, a Pakatan Harapan defector, gained power after he proved to the king that the new Perikatan Nasional had the support of the majority of MPs.
Muhyiddin who? Najib’s still the real problem in Malaysia: Mahathir
13 Jun 2020
At long last, a verdict

No matter the long term impact, however, analysts said Tuesday’s verdict will mark a major landmark in the 1MDB trials. The verdict relates to the first trial involving Najib that stretches back to April last year.

The seven charges in this case are part of the 42 criminal charges Najib is facing over his alleged role in the looting of some US$4.5 billion from the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) state fund during his tenure as prime minister.

Of the five different trials, prosecutors are believed to have proceeded with this particular case first as the money trail is contained within Malaysia, making it far less complicated and more likely to lead to a guilty verdict. Two other trials are under way.

Najib Razak, Malaysia's former prime minister, prays with his supporters as he arrives at the Kuala Lumpur Courts Complex to stand trial. Photo: Bloomberg

This case is known in media circles as the SRC International trial, referencing the 1MDB subsidiary that prosecutors say funnelled 42 million ringgit (US$9.85 million) of ill-gotten funds from the state investor to Najib’s personal accounts.

Najib, who turned 67 last week, faces the prospect of a lengthy jail sentence if Justice Mohd Nazlan Ghazali finds him guilty of just one of the seven charges.
Any reasonable person, in particular a man of finance, will know or ought to have known what was going on. Prosecutor V. Sithambaram
In closing arguments, Najib’s defence team sought to pin blame on wrongdoing at SRC International on the fugitive financier Jho Low and other key personalities who were named during the trial. These included Nik Faisal Ariff Kamil – SRC International’s former chief executive who is currently on the run – and Joanna Yu, a bank relationships manager who managed Najib’s personal bank account.

Malaysian-born Low was a close acquaintance of Najib and has been identified by prosecutors in Malaysia and the United States – where separate criminal investigations over the scandal are ongoing – as a central figure in the controversy.
Yours for US$100 million: 1MDB fugitive Jho Low’s Beverly Hills hotel
7 Jul 2020
The financier has rejected the allegations against him as politically motivated and said he has no plans to return to Malaysia to face justice. There are outstanding arrest warrants for him in Malaysia and neighbouring Singapore.

Najib’s lawyers say the former prime minister believed the money that flowed into his accounts – originating first from SRC International – formed part of political donations pledged to him by the Saudi royal family.

For this reason, the lawyers argue that Najib did not question the source of incoming funds into his accounts.

Najib Razak, Malaysia's former prime minister, leaves the Kuala Lumpur Courts Complex. Photo: Bloomberg

In his final submissions, V. Sithambaram, the lead prosecutor, said the defence argument was a fig leaf. “[The defence] are making a lot of hue and cry that the accused was misled to believe he still had Arab funds when he used up the 42 million ringgit,” he said.

“This is nothing but a myth. The fact that 42 million ringgit came into his account is not disputed … he is just saying that he did not know it was SRC money. This is ridiculous. Any reasonable person, in particular a man of finance, will know or ought to have known what was going on,” Sithambaram said.
Goldman, Malaysia agree to US$3.9 billion settlement over 1MDB scandal
24 Jul 2020
Tuesday’s verdict follows Friday’s settlement worth a total US$3.9 billion between the Perikatan Nasional government and Goldman Sachs over the investment bank’s role in raising funds for 1MDB.
As part of the deal, Malaysia will drop previously filed criminal charges against Goldman Sachs, which denies any wrongdoing.

Earlier last week, Najib was ordered by a court to settle 1.69 billion ringgit (US$397.41 million) in unpaid taxes over seven years while he was still in office.
Ex-Malaysian PM Najib ordered to pay US$400 million in unpaid taxes
22 Jul 2020
Bhavan Jaipragas
Bhavan is Asia Correspondent for the SCMP, covering breaking news, politics, diplomacy, trade and Southeast Asian macroeconomic trends. His work for the Post's Asia desk also focuses on the region's multifaceted interactions with the United States and China. A Singapore native, Bhavan previously worked for Agence France-Presse.
Staged?

One former DPP wondered as to why Goldman Sachs settlement was announced four days before the SRC decision. It cannot be scripted by anyone from PH administration because it Tan Sri Idrus Haron and Tengku Dato Zafrul Aziz that could do the closure. . 

Not only the Goldman Sachs settlement, few other developments indicate that the verdict is known and the public is being prepped for the eventuality. Court ordered Najib to pay RM1.69 billion tax to  Inland Revenue Board.

Round one of the seat distrbution between BN, PAS and PPBM completed last week. Few UMNO leaders suggesting Muhyiddin to return to UMNO. Utusan Malaysia's frontpaged Ku Li's interview with the headline for Zahid, Najib and problematic leaders to make way.   

Mahathir and son, Dato Mukhriz have been chanting Najib Najib Najib at the blackout gathering in Alor Setar and in Parliament to reiterate the kleptocrat and robbery accusation. It served to revive his pre-GE14 political narrative and pre-empting an acquital.

Astute observer believe a guilty verdict could leave him void of any narrative to continue his fight against Muhyiddin. Political pundits are predicting his eventual return to UMNO upon Muhyuddin assuming power in UMNO.

Whether UMNO is throwing Najib under the bus, it does not seem so. His recent birthday was celebrated at PWTC and attended by party leaders. There are special prayers for Najib today held at PWTC this afternoon, organised by several groups at few locations at night, and same nationwide within the UMNO establishments.

Unsaid is a guilty verdict will solve the political logjam. However, a former political operator for Mahathir disagree and insist it will not get solved. If it is going against Najib, it could happen against other UMNO leaders.

Honolulu slip up?

The poser by The Edge in their June 18th article is quite relevant: Was Najib a victim or protagonist in the conspiracy?

Opinions of learned legal minds and information from sources considered as close proxy of Justice Nazlan ranges from acquital to guilty on all counts. Guilty for CBT poses the toughest challenge for Justice Nazlan.

It requires existence of trust over the property (entrustment), wrongful act and dishonesty. For a criminal charge, it requires proofs beyond reasonable doubts. Generally, most legal observers saw the case is full of doubts especially the testimony of Ambank Manager, Joanna Yu.

A lawyer with the Bar Council is of the view that the case should not have commenced. Three key witness; deceased Dato Adlin Alias, Najib's former Principal Private Secretary, Taek Jho Low and Nik Faisal are not brought to court to corroborate the testimonies.

The evidence chain is broken and huge gap in evidence exist.

The defense that prosecution could not prove the element of knowledge points to an innocent Najib. However, it is the small issues that could pose a problem. Taken from The Edge article, could the issue below nail Najib for CBT:
The prosecution, however, insisted that Low, Nik Faisal, as well as the late Datuk Azlin Alias — Najib’s principal private secretary — had acted under the former premier's instructions. 
Low did not act "behind the scenes", Sithambaram argued, as the businessman’s actions indicated his full knowledge of Najib's spending patterns. In fact, on several occasions, Low took proactive steps to ensure there were sufficient funds in Najib’s accounts, he said, highlighting one particular time when Low contacted Yu to ensure that a credit card payment by Najib would go through. 
Sithambaram was referring to a payment by Najib in Honolulu, Hawaii, in December 2014, which did not go through because of a credit card system issue. Low informed Yu through BlackBerry Messenger that he received a message from "MNR"— referring to Najib — that the transaction had not gone through.
An astute follower claimed Najib never denied he has spoken or met Jho Low, but he denied telling him to pay for his Honolulu bill. However, The Edge reported he did spoke on money matters. Was any audio evidence submitted?

Abuse of power?

Putting aside prosecution opinion that the CBT offense is complete because dishonesty was commited, another way to get Najib in or end his political career is on abuse of power. To quote from MMO's report on Justice Nazlan decision to order defense:
In delivering his judgement, Mohd Nazlan ruled that Najib played a role in the establishment of SRC International and its RM4 billion loan from the Retirement Fund Incorporated (KWAP) in 2011.

“Because of the accused being a prime minister and the finance minister, he was able to cause the establishment of SRC International that was made possible by his overarching authority.

“And as the PM and Minister of Finance Incorporated (MoF Inc) the accused also caused the introduction of a new article 117 to appoint himself as adviser emeritus of the company, to whom advice on strategic matters concerning SRC must be referred,” he said.

He said the crucial ability of Najib as the shareholder to have convinced — via his position as MoF Inc — SRC International’s directors to adhere to important decisions such as the deposits of the bulk of the company funds overseas could not be emphasised enough.

He said that the evidence of involvement of or on the series of actions taken by the accused in respect of SRC International demonstrated that the accused held an interest beyond that of public office.

One of these instances included Najib’s failure to disclose or excuse himself from the deliberations and approvals on the Cabinet memorandum on two government guarantees for the loans extended by KWAP to SRC International at two Cabinet meetings he chaired.

“The argument that the accused had not given instructions but merely made requests and had no role to play in securing the loans from KWAP cannot withstand scrutiny.
The ruling prima facie could have been made to satisfy public interest to have all out in the open. It is usually based on the consideration of on-balance probability and basic ingredients met. However, criminal charges require burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt.

To get Najib in on abuse of power but not on CBT, it will be similar to getting Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim for abuse of power instead of his first charge for sodomy. On hind sight, it turned out there were invisible hands of a short man dictating judges from high court to federal court.

The basic premise for a specific time and place for crime committed were not met. It should have been thrown out at the early stage. Mahathir ....

Abuse of power offense has too wide a definition and is itself open for abuse. To sentence Najib for his involvement to assist SRC, it implies any Minister assisting to speed up bureaucrasy and assist to resolve administrative problems will be deemed as abusing their power.

Dato Adham Baba may need to hire a lawyer immediately. 

It makes no sense and unreasonable for Justice Nazlan to make Najib guilty for any political master by using only the offense of abuse of power.     

Ball in his court

A retired Federal Court judge was asked sometime ago on the possible verdict for Dato Najib's SRC case Tuesday. He highlighted the major shortcomings of the case made. At the end of his answer, he summed it up as depends on the judge.     

It came to this blogger's knowledge that Justice Nazlan was asked by a fellow judge how he would do the SRC case. Justice Nazlan said without hesitant he will decide based strictly on the law. One pro-BN lawyer have dealt with Justice Nazlan and acknowledged him as meticulous.

The risk is a "wrong" judgement on this politically sensitive case may land Justice Nazlan in the cold room. It  happened to Dato Zabidin Md Diah for chickening out against overwhelming evidences for guilty verdict on Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim's second sodomy case in 2012.

The implication of Justice Nazlan's decision is far reaching. It means neither could he be seen as basing his judgement merely on the common folks logic of "takkanlah Najib tak tahu" (don't tell me Najib does not know) which Sithambaram used in his submission.

Nor could it be based on the simplistic explanation of money went into his personal account. It is not so simple.

There should not be any suspicion the judgement is planned for guilty at High Court level and acquittal at Court of Appeal. That smells underhanded politics!

The decision must be convincing that it is conclusively proven Najib has knowledge. Apparently, the Penang High Court accepted Lim Guan Eng claim of no knowledge of the market value of his Jalan Pinhorn bungalow and acquited him in 2018.

With doubts in abundance, the elephant in the room of missing key witnesses and obvious evidence gap cannot be ignored.

Final thought before SRC verdict

$
0
0

Its D-Day for Dato Najib.

SRC is the low lying fruits within reach of Tun Dr Mahathir to send Najib to the prison to what seemed a political prosecution for refusing and resisting his wishes.

If convicted, Mahathir will be absolved from accusation of slander, cruelty, and obsessive behaviours typical of megalomaniac dictators.

Though Dato Gopal Sri Ram's manipulative hands are visibly seen, and Tan Sri Tommy Thomas's incompetence and biasness are obvious for all to see, Mahathir will deny of having his hands behind the scheme. . 

The responsibility will be placed on the court as though the process was a lawful, fair and transparent one.

A day before verdict, Dato Najib said in his FB he will continue to seek for justice.

As he played down the significance of  this morning outcome, he wrote, irrespective of which side win, there will be an appeal. 

It could imply a guilty verdict may not mean it is divine truth or justice. After all, not all truth, be it actual true happenings, could be translated into evidence or corroborated statement by witness.

In other words, the court action may not be reflective of the absolute truth and justice. More so, judges is bound by judiciary process with its human limitation.

Facebooker Salahuddin Hisham posted this view:
The nature of legal practise is adversarial. Each side is out to win with whatever ways it takes.

They seldom claim to be, but one could not trust the claim judiciary system and its players are honest and sincere to seek for truth and justice.

Unfortunately, the court is the proxy of truth, systematic gauge of human dispensed justice, and offers finality to disputes and judgement for offenses on temporal earth.

One has to accept that.

It means it should not matter what others think, but the only thing that matter is we try our best to be truthful, honest, purveyor of good deeds, and wise to the eyes of God.

The winners can rejoice. The losers can mourn. It is Allah blessing that only matter. Rahmat Allah yg kita mahu...

Wallahu alam bissawwab. God's blessing and guidance we seek.

No sacrifice at all

$
0
0

Salam Aidil Adha 

Both sermons at the Masjid were talking about ritual of sacrifice. 

It is to commemmurate the Quranic story of Prophet Abrahim undergoing the ultimate test of faith to carry out Allah's commandment to slaughter his own son, Prophet Ismail.  

The morning sermon at our neighbourhood surau was particularly moving and expressed the essence in the meaning of sacrifice. 

It was the story of a pious and learned man, who received a dream of being told by Prophet Muhammad that all the pious men and women he knew were not awarded Haj Mabrur, except for a person by the name of Abdullah. 


Sacrifice


Upon searching for the person Abdullah, the pious and learned man found him to be a simple cobbler. 

The pious man told him of his dream. The prophet mentioned him as gaining Haj Mabrur. When told, the cobbler was shocked. He had not perfomed the Haj yet. 

The pious man asked what did he do to deserve such mentioning. The cobbler said he did nothing, except helped a widow and her six children. 

He had saved enough money by putting aside money earned from his vocation as cobbler and was ready to go to Mecca. 

Then one day, his pregnant wife smelled someone's cooking and had a craving for it. He searched and found the smell coming from a run-down widow's home. 

The cobbler asked for a little of the meat cooked for his craving wife and was willing to pay for it. The widow sadly told him she could not give. The food is halal for us, but haram for him. 

He was shocked and asked what she meant. The widow explained that she found a rotting donkey and took some pieces of meat to cook for her family. They had not eaten for days. 

The cobbler understood and returned. He told his craving wife. 

She prepared some food and the cobbler sent it over to them. He gave all the money he saved for Haj to the widow. Told her to use the money to make a living so that you and your family will not go hungry again. 

The cobbler abandoned his plan to perform Haj. He was not tested by Allah to sacrifice his children, but he was tested to forego the holy journey he saved all his life to help a widow. 

It is a similar story to that of Abdullah ibni Mubarrok

Test


This year millions of Muslims are being denied the chance of a lifetime to perform the Haj. 

The images of an empty Kaaba and barren looking field of Arafah during wukuf yesterday was disheartening. Saudi Arabia disallowed Haj this year due to Corona Covid 19 pandemic. Aspiring Dhufur Rahman (invitee of Allah) are being denied the opportunity.   

In his sermon, the Imam of the Masjid at Arafah mentioned the test of Allah in his sermon, as in the extract from Geo News below:


Hajj 2020 Khutbah: 'In adversity, turn to your Lord with humility, penitence, and hope'

Delivering the Hajj sermon in Makkah from Masjid-e-Nimra in Arafat, Sheikh Abdullah bin Sulaiman on Thursday said that in times of adversity, such as the current coronavirus pandemic, we must turn to our Lord "with humility, penitence and hope".

"My dear audience, life in this world does not remain free of difficulty, and this is why Allah, the Most Exalted, instructed us to persevere," said Sheikh Sulaiman.

He said that adversities "serve as a test for people", and "allow those who persevere to be distinguished from those who are impatient".

Sheikh Sulaiman reminded everyone that "no matter how difficult circumstances may become in this world, those difficulties do not last forever".

"Allah's mercy is always more expansive, and the relief He grants is always near."

Read on here
Just like the cobbler Abdullah, the millions due to for pilgrimage are also denied. The comfort is it is hardly close to the test and sacrifice faced by the cobbler and Prophet Abraham. 

This relate to the event of July 28th. 

Whether it is a sacrifice and test or punishment, only Allah knows the absolute truth. Human is limited by merely an indicative of the truth. 

Either way, leave it to Allah for guidance. Face it with humility, penitence and hope. 

Are PM's son, PPBM behind frontrunners for RM1.5 billion IIS tender?

$
0
0

The government opened tender for the Integrated Immigration System (IIS) and in September 2018, announced receiving 30 bids ranging from RM1 billion to RM1.8 billion

The single company contract attracted known local players such as Scicom, Datasonic, HeiTech Padu, etc. 

The contract attracted public interest because the RM3.5 billionn Sistem Kawalan Imigresen Nasional (SKIN) concession awarded to Prestariang in August 2017 was to replace the frequently breaking down MyIMM. My Home Minister Dato Hamzah Zainuddin acknowledged the weakness of MyIMM

SKIN system development commenced work, but PH government cancelled it. It will be 3 years in 2023 before IIS will be operationalise. The re-tender was criticised as waste of time and resources, and political witch hunting.

By third quarter, the winning bid is expected to be announced. Latest heard is some 10 names, later two more added, have been short listed. 

Judging from the names, there is this gnawing suspicion that Dr Abu Hassan Ismail and Prestariang was made sacrificial lamb for certain self interest.

Frontrunner

Focus Malaysia reported recently:

Who owns this company vying for RM1.5 bil immigration system tender?

By Xavier Kong 06/10/2020 


  
The RM1.5 bil National Integrated Immigration System (IIS) is expected to be awarded soon and the frontrunners have been identified.

The usual suspects include listed tech giants Datasonic Group Bhd, Scicom (MSC) Bhd, HeiTech Padu Bhd and Opcom Holdings Bhd. Thrown in the mix are Iris Corp Bhd and MyEG Services Bhd.

But there is also an unlisted company that identifies as a global integrated security solutions provider for governments and enterprises – S5 Systems Sdn Bhd. This was reported by FocusM in December last year.

Given that this company is privately held, not much is known about them. According to company filings, the ultimate beneficial owner of the company is an offshore or overseas entity NSA Technology (L) Inc which in turn owns NSA Technology Sdn Bhd, the parent company of S5 Systems.
 
S5 Systems’ directors are Syed Mohammad Hafiz Syed Razlan, Aaron Loke Khy-Min, Kurian Thomas Jacob Thomas, Effendi Ramli and Chan See Siang.

Syed Mohammad Hafiz is the sole director of NSA Technology Sdn Bhd. Both S5 Systems and NSA Technology share an office.

Syed Mohammad Hafiz’s father Syed Razlan Syed Putra Jamalullail is the younger brother of Raja Perlis Tuanku Syed Sirajuddin Putra Jamalullail. Syed Razlan was former Arau MP and he joined Bersatu from Umno on July 15, 2018.

Syed Mohammad Hafiz also owns a 0.42% stake in listed automobile leather seat designer Pecca Group Bhd.

But the trail stops there as NSA Technology (L) Inc is an offshore or overseas company. Its shareholders and owners can’t be ascertained except for a 2016 report that links NSA Technology Sdn Bhd to well-connected entrepreneur Johann Young. But company filings for NSA Technology Sdn Bhd do not reflect Young’s name.

This raises questions as the IIS is a matter of national security.

According to the latest filings, S5 Systems’ total assets stood at RM82.7 mil with revenue of RM116.8 mil and a profit-after-tax of RM68.3 mil for the financial year ended June 30, 2019.

For context, other frontrunners especially the listed companies have better transparency as they are subject to Main Market requirements and are under the purview of Bursa Malaysia.

Conversely, S5 Systems remains a relatively unknown company in the matter with no clear ultimate beneficial owner. This raises concerns that an important tender involving national security might be awarded to an opaque company.

At the time of writing, FocusM’s attempts to contact S5 Systems as well as NSA Technology were unsuccessful. – June 10, 2020

Who is S5?

S5 have been getting the attention or promoted by NST below:

IIS contract to be awarded in 3Q this year

By NST Business - June 30, 2020 @ 1:07pm


The ISS project is essentially the new version of what was previously called SKIN or Sistem Kawalan Imigresen Nasional, worth RM3.5 billion. NSTP/WEB

KUALA LUMPUR: The RM1.5 billion National Integrated Immigration System (IIS) is expected to be awarded in the third quarter of this year, sources said.

Talks have it that S5 Holdings Inc's unit S5 Systems Sdn Bhd has joined the likes of Iris Corp Bhd, MyEG Services Bhd, Datasonic Group Bhd and HeiTech Padu Bhd as bidders for the contract.

S5 Systems had the track record and position as a market leader in the provision of national security solutions, said people with knowledge on the matter.

The ISS project is essentially the new version of what was previously called SKIN or Sistem Kawalan Imigresen Nasional, worth RM3.5 billion.

According to the latest filings, S5 Systems' total assets stand at RM82.7 million.

It's net profit for the year ended June 30, 2019 was RM68.3 million on the back of a revenue of RM116.8 million.

It is learned that S5 Systems is eyeing a backdoor listing via ConnectCounty Holdings Bhd as the fastest means to raise more funds to fully complete the ISS project should it get it, and to secure more jobs from the government.

At the time of writing, the New Straits Times' attempts to contact S5 Systems and ConnectCounty were unsuccessful.

In a filing with Bursa Malaysia on June 16, ConnectCounty informed that it was in negotiations with the relevant party pertaining to the possible reverse takeover involving S5 Systems.

"The company has not signed any agreement on the said matter. However, it shall make the necessary announcement when there are further developments on this matter," it said, when clarifying an article on an investors' portal.

It was quoted in the article that ConnectCounty would be the next vehicle for the backdoor listing by S5 Systems.

Meanwhile, MyEG Services said it was taking a 10 per cent stake in S5 Holdings.

MyEG Services's wholly-owned My E.G. Capital Sdn Bhd (MyEG Capital) had entered into a share sale agreement with Merrington Assets Ltd early this month to buy 118 million shares or 10 per cent of S5 Holdings for RM90 million.

The company told Bursa that the planned acquisition was based on S5 group's track record and future prospects as well as the potential synergistic benefits arising from the acquisition and the favourable outlook of the digitalisation of government services.

The Edge wrote that S5 system approached all the other bidders and offered their biometric system. S5 is in a consortium with MyEg and Heitech Padu. 

And, MyEG is heard to pursue the IIS contract through several routes and the suspicion is they are backing other shortlisted bidder too. 

DNeX and Scicom is mentioned also as having a chance. 

Datasonic?

Another company to be taken notice is Datasonic

It has a secured position and expected to get extension for the passports and NRIC contracts with government with an additional contract recently.    

The market is strongly viewing Datasonic as a frontrunner on the strength of their experience in biometric facial recognition for border control system, next generation system JV and online foreign worker online registration. 




The manner pro-opposition mainstream media are raising issues it is as if PM's son and/or son-in-law is/are involved in the IIS tender. Is any of them behind Datasonic or MyEg.com or S5?

Illegal immigrants and fake NRIC became a public concern during Muhyiddin's tenure as PH Home Minister. It needs solutions. 

Under Hamzah, the buzz among businessmen offering solutions is Home Ministry is off limit for others. It is PPBM's fishing spot.   

Prestariang sacrificial lamb


There was a system failure at KLIA and KLIA2 in August last year during one of the holidays. It resulted in massive congestion and airport had to go manual. 

Pro-BN social media commentators speculated it was part of a PH scam to bring in illegal immigrant by disfunctioning the immigration system. 

It seemed believable because PH government unilaterally terminated the 15-year RM3.5 billion SKIN consession awarded to Prestariang Berhad in a letter dated December 2018. 

Prestariang were awarded the concession in August 2017. Coincidently there was congestion in the month and year the contract was awarded due to high volume of travelers for Immigration system to handle

However, the congestion last year was due to airport network system failure. Nevertheless, the immigration system has since been under the radar of business media. 

Prestariang suffered financially from the ordeal. Once a more than a billion ringgit capitalisation company, it is reduced to few hundred millions. 

Founder, President and CEO Dr Abu Hassan Ismail lost his company. It seemed Prestariang could not recover from the surprise. Market speculated it was no more a viable ongoing concern. 

There was resentment towards PH for killing off a rising Malay entrepreneur. And, public supported Prestariang's action to sue government for RM733 million in April 2019. 


Latest court decision indicated government will have to pay Dr Abu compensation. He could subsequently restart Prestariang by subscribing to a 15% private placement.  


With the suspicious happening evolving around the IIS tender, were Dr Abu and Prestariang made a sacrifical lamb for Muhyiddin's family and PPBM?

Justice4Adib: Police whitewash or failure to investigate?

$
0
0

On Tuesday August 4th, Home Minister, Dato Seri Hamzah Zainudin informed Parliament that police will take actions in relation to the "murder" of firefighter Muhammad Adib. Taken from The Sun below:

The investigation paper (IP) on the death of firefighter Muhammad Adib Mohd Kassim (pix) had been referred back to the Attorney-General’s Chambers on July 23 along with several suggestions, the Dewan Rakyat was told today.
 
Home Minister Datuk Seri Hamzah Zainudin said the IP, among other things, suggested for 12 suspects who were previously believed of being involved in Adib’s death on Dec 17, 2018, to be charged under Section 143 of the Penal Code.

Hamzah received applause from other members. Saved for expected resistance from Indian MPs in the opposition, it appeared as though the long arms of the law have found its way to the alleged murderers. 

Upon reflection, it is no big deal and seemed a whitewash or sheer wayang.


The reaction of the father will naturally be cynical and be first to react to anything less than the murderers are taken to justice. Muslim NGOs like PEMBELA have been vocal and consistently in pursuit to demand Justice4Adib and supportive of the father.

A lawyer and activist, Aidil Khalid immediately see through the whitewash to write in Malay on his Facebook, reproduced verbatim below:

Ada banyak masalah dengan kenyataan Menteri Dalam Negeri ini.
  
Dia kata kerajaan bercadang mendakwa semula 12 suspek bunuh Adib. Tetapi pendakwaan akan dibuat di bawah seksyen 143 Kanun Keseksaan, dan bukan di bawah pertuduhan membunuh.

Seksyen 143 ialah kesalahan kecil, yang hukuman maksimumnya hanya denda sahaja, atau penjara paling lama pun cuma boleh 6 bulan, tak boleh lebih.

Kau bayangkan, nyawa seorang pegawai bomba berbangsa Melayu beragama Islam melayang dibunuh dalam rusuhan di Kuil Hindu, dan kau nak cadangkan hukum denda atau penjara 6 bulan sahaja?

Ini namanya pendakwaan tebuk atap, kerja sekadar melepaskan batuk di tangga, tidak bersungguh-sungguh, dengan harapan rakyat tak sedar dan bodoh tak faham, akan berpuas hati, “almahdulillah syukur perdana menteri pandai baca doa di tv, alhamdulillah, takbirrrrRrrrr, takbirrrRrrrr, akhirnya pendakwaan dibuat terhadap pembunuh Adib.”

Walhal pendakwaan bukan pun atas kesalahan membunuh. 

Masalah kedua pula ialah Menteri kata kerajaan bercadang untuk buka semula inkues — bermaksud kerajaan tak setuju dengan keputusan inkues sebelum ini, maka perlu inkues sekali lagi.

Tapi jika dibaca seksyen 339(2) Kanun Acara Jenayah, bahagian provisonya sangat jelas, bahawa apabila sesuatu inkues itu telah dijalankan oleh Mahkamah Koroner, dan keputusannya mendapati punca kematian adalah berakibat daripada berlakunya jenayah bunuh, maka keputusan itu adalah muktamad. Jadi kerajaan tidak boleh nak buat inkues semula, sebaliknya kerajaan mesti akur dan patuh dengan keputusan Mahkamah Koroner sebelum ini, yang menegaskan bahawa Adib mati dibunuh.

Jika kerajaan tidak bersetuju, maka kerajaan hanya boleh cabar keputusan Mahkamah Koroner itu melalui prosiding Semakan Kehakiman (judicial review). Tetapi Semakan Kehakiman hanya boleh difailkan dalam tempoh 3 bulan dari tarikh keputusan sahaja.

Kerajaan tidak pernah memfailkan sebarang permohonan untuk semakan kehakiman, dan tempoh 3 bulan itu pun telah lama luput; maka sebab itu hasil dapatan inkues yang memutuskan bahawa Adib mati dibunuh, dan mengarahkan PDRM untuk mencari para pembunuhnya, adalah muktamad, dan mesti dihormati serta dipatuhi oleh semua.



Bacaan lanjut:



Adil had earlier criticised IGP, Tan Sri Hamid Bador for claiming Adib was not murdered because no witness to say he was murdered. Police sources said the same during the height of the Seaview temple incident. 

However, Aidil violently disagree. Just because it is claimed no one saw the murder act, it does not imply Adib was not murdered. 

The young lawyer quoted the murder of Sosilawati, in which the judgement on the murderers were recently made. There was no eyewitness at the crime scene. Its called circumstantial evidence.  

He said Hamid Bador should read the Coroner report from the Inquest held at the request of former AG, Tommy Thomas. It means there are circumstantial evidence for the police to investigate and scour for more evidence. 

The career special branch officer must differentiate between evidence-based criminal cases and information-based security case. Eyewitness is not the only source of evidence. Since Tommy Thomas seemed to cover-up any wrongdoings by committee of Seaview Hindu temple, is the IGP  colluding to cover-up too? 

Immediately after the incident, the attempt to cover-up was too obvious. The Inquest was a time wasting effort by Tommy, who as AG is conflicted and had represented the interest of the questionable legality of the Hindu temple in negotiations with developer.

The developer agreed to allocate another piece of land for relocation and paid compensation. However, the temple committee took the money and land, but still insistent on staying put.

Adil wrote a good background of the incident in his late June FB posting, including the sacking of lawyer Syahzlin Mansor from representing KPKT by Tommy. 


He demanded on the politics-evading new AG, Tan Sri Idrus Haron to not be soft:

16. Amatlah malang, kerana walaupun setelah berlaku perubahan tampuk pimpinan negara, dan Tommy Thomas disingkirkan serta digantikan dengan Peguam Negara baharu, tetapi ternyata Peguam Negara baharu masih mengekalkan pendirian, keputusan dan tindak tanduk lama Tommy Thomas dahulu. Justeru terserah kepada kita kini, untuk menilai secara adil dan munasabah: adakah mereka yang dahulunya begitu lantang memperjuangkan keadilan untuk arwah Adib, benar-benar memperjuangkannya demi keadilan, ataukah sekadar menunggangnya untuk kepentingan politik, dan setelah mereka dapat apa yang mereka kehendaki, maka kuda tunggangan itu pun mereka tinggalkan?

There are issues the views of young Aidil may not be in tandem with popular views, but on this, he is spot on.  

That is the MRSM spirit! Its the sense of independence, strong willed and fighter for causes deemed to be the truth and pursuit of justice. It beats the fishy MCOBA civil judge turned criminal judge that was given a big case as his first and fumbled it big time. 

The lies, lies, and still lying Guan Eng

$
0
0

For almost two weeks, from the Tuesday July 28th, DAP had been rubbing it in on UMNO, BN, MN and even the legally non-existent PN on Dato Najib's unfavourable SRC judgement.

Quite sure they realised that the judgement is a double edged sword. Prime Minister, Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin gave his assurance that he will not interfere in the process of the law. Though there are Najib supporters cynically view it as giving Tun Dr Mahathir the free hands to fix cases against the former PM, his hand-off stance will apply to others.

Lim Guan Eng was called in by MACC for several sessions after the SRC judgement. The long arm of the law have finally reached him. Instead of facing the case gentlemenly, DAP dramatised it. Guan Eng continue to try lie his way out. 

He was charged for corruption relating to the Penang tunnel project. DAP expected him to be charged and on the day of mentioning, DAP started their psywar to claim innocence and calling it political persecution.

They can lie as much as they want, but the facts remain that every Penangite can see the condo on the Penang man-made island developed by E-wien. The tunnel was to be paid via land swap, however no tunnel was built, yet condo is up. 

There will be another charge coming on Monday and another for Tuesday will be related, but not directly on the Jalan Pinhorn bungalow. 

It certainly was not a good week for Guan Eng. In Parliament, Minister of Finance, Tengku Dato Zafrul tengku Aziz exposed the lies Guan Eng spewed for the 22 months he was Minister. 

Debt


The debt level of government was not RM1.26 trillion, but it was as many BN commentators claimed it was fabricated debt figure which is not the convention to include liabilities, particularly contingent liabilities. The condition must be invoked before it turned into liability or debt!

Nevertheless, the figure was still a significant increase from RM1 trillion fabricated debt figure for BN government.

Government direct debt without being inflated by liabilities as at end of 2017 was RM686 billion. At the time PH lost the government in first quarter 2020, it stands at RM824 billion. A whopping increase by RM138 billion.

In 2019, it was announced that debt was still at RM741.049 billion equivalent to 51.8% of GDP. 

Where did the effing money go to?
 
Goldman Sachs

Former Attorney General, Tan Sri Tommy Thomas lied to the public with regard to the Goldman Sachs settlement. 



A document only recently declassified from OSA went viral (see Malaysia Today here). It turned out they offered a deal of US$4 billion. Mahathir, and Guan Eng was later informed by TT that Goldman was only willing to offer for US$1.5 billion. 

Zafrul got a better deal out of Goldman.


PH claimed they will not negotiate and sue them in court, but it turned out Mahathir and Guan Eng lied. There were looking for off-court settlement! 



Exposed also there were no serious effort to charge Goldman Sachs. Guan Eng tried to cover his lies in the Dewan.
  
Effing liar!

GST

Guan Eng reaction to try to escape the embarassment for being caught lying using cabinet approval came about due to the an earlier exposure that his decision to zero-rised GST was made without any cabinet approval.


There was no RM19.48 billion GST rebate fund robbed to pay for 1MDB debt. He effing lied and illegally made a major decision without cabinet approval. 

Shouldn't he be charged for it?!

Tabung Harapan


Nevertheless, Tengku Zafrol was fair. He confirmed money raised through Tabung Harapan was used to pay for 1MDB debt. The money collected totalling RM205.49 million was used to pay

Its rather funny and weird that Najib haters collected money to pay for a financial mess accused solely on Najib. These PH supporters are effing clowns in a political circus act.

The full speech by Tengku Zafrol is available in the You Tube below:


Penang Tunnel


Where Tengku Zafrol have been truthful and apolitical in his submission to Parliament, one cannot say for DAP's sense of fairplay. The political theatric they tried to pull-off upon announcement by MACC that Guan Eng is due to face court for several charges is an insult to anyone's intelligence. 

After being exposed for his lies in Parliament, he was arrested by MACC on Thursday. Quite a routine procedure. Its a sweet victory for two fighters on this issue - Dato Huan Cheng Guan and not quite demure Facebooker by the pseudonym Lim Sian See. 


He had allegedly seek 10% kickback from Dato Zafrul Ahmad. 

If Najib was laughed at for use of his personal account, Guan Eng made a rookie mistake of negotiating directly without middleman. Obviously, he trusted no one!

All the while the person giving the kickback never denied giving it. In fact, Raja Petra exposure few years ago that got him sued in absence had mentioned long list of names - DAP and UMNO politicians!

Propaganda

DAP was quick with their propaganda campaign to blame on Raja Petra:


Instead of focusing on their case and respecting the process of the law, they are in their customary ways to manipulate the facts:


The fact is:


The facts to be presented to the court as written by MCA politician and former DPP, Chan Quinn Er in her twitter are as follows:

My reply to YB Yeo Bee Yin (杨美盈) on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ChanQuinEr/status/1291648282934906880?s=20

1. It was NOT awarded through open tender but through RFP (Request for Proposal). In RFP, bidders submit their own proposals. Each proposal is different, so you cannot compare them. RFP is a type of PPP (Public-Private Partnership). According to Prof Jomo, PPP projects are more easily abused because they are ‘off balance sheet’, and therefore do not show up on government debt. Source: 

2. Tender committee was indeed chaired by chief secretary & LGE was not part of it. But was that secretary truly impartial?  On Aug 5, he was made CEO of a state company handling RM46bil of PTMP projects, just 8 months into retirement. MACC already called him up in July. Source:


3. Not a single cent paid. But after a RM208 million landswap, and two projects with GDV of RM800 million & RM15 billion later built on them, I daresay it is a profit much higher than one cent. Source: 


 
A lengthy explanation can be found here

An MCA social media activist, Michele Chan Hzmm  rebutted Tony Pua claim it is not corruption and case was closed, so it is political persecution. The truth the matter the investigation was never closed. She disputed Yeo Bee Yin attempt to claim RFP is open tender when it is actually not

There is another tunnel charge tomorrow.

LATEST 10/8/20 11:00 AM

 

Jalan Pinhorn

Phang Li Koon and Guan Eng's wife have been apprehended by MACC on the day Guan Eng was held by MACC. Both are due to appear in court with Guan Eng on Tuesday. As usual Guan Eng has his drama. 

Lim Kit Siang pleaded for her not to be charged. He and Guan Eng said MACC should not be pursuing the family. The fact is she is conflicted. 
The facts of this case as revealed by Raja Petra here is about payback in exchange for approval for housing for workers project. The foreign workers permit is interesting enough to dig up further also, but let's stick to the evidence relating to the case. 

The documents are telling. 





Kantoi

DAP leaders are claiming Guan Eng and his wife cannot be charged for the same offense he was acquited for. Well ... there was an amendment to Act 1378 which had taken into effect from 1/6/2012 with regards to the criminal code on the introduction of Section 254A. 

Gobind and Ram Karpal Singh will likely make varying applications to strike out the case befoe the trials can actually go on. They will take it all the way to Federal Court. Its an Anwaresque delay tactic.

The laughs does not end there. There are jokers defending Guan Eng with the claim he had defended the modesty of a young Malay woman and willing to face imprisonment. It is as though he is a willing martyr in facing up against cruelty.  

The truth is as Raja Petra commented.

DAP is promoting solidarity for Guan Eng and to get the buy-in, they are seeking RM10 per person donation. 


Its quite laughable for these rich politicans to seek money from the public. 

  
For a RM6.3 billion tunnel project and the so-called RM209 million feasibility studies came with a 10% kickback, have they no shame to still trying to lie to the public and themselves? 

Enough the lying 


To quote a conversation on social media:

When UMNO leaders faced charges in court, they created a perception of how guilty the leaders were, including hurling accusation that they were robbers, thieves and corrupt. 

But when LGE was charged, they begged for sympathy by collecting funds for his legal fee. They even claimed the charges were all politically-motivated. We must tell them to avoid any double standard in dealing with a this case.

That is the difference between UMNO and DAP.  UMNO do not hold press conference and support for Dato Najib & Dato Zahid. DAP dragged their party and Chinese for their cases before trail begins to pressure authorities and judges. 

To advise them to not do drama, it will be futile. They are likely hoping to win an impending GE15 to save themselves again. There goes judiciary system again. It will further turns off foreign investors. 

Young politician intermediary in Iris's NIIS tender?

$
0
0

The latest Edge Weekly has a breaking story on the RM1.5 billion National Integrated Immigration System (NIIS) tender written two weeks ago. Iris and MyEG was headlined as front runners. 

MyEG was given coverage in the article, "Are PM's son, PPBM behind frontrunners for RM1.5 billion IIS tender?​" It has the tie-up with S5, which could be politically backed. Iris was not mentioned earlier, but now getting Edge Weekly's attention as a front runner in a 12-company race.  

The blog posting was about the cancellation of concession awarded to Prestariang by government and subsequently open for tender by government to men it is willing to spend to develop the system. The manner media is keeping tab on the front runners it is as though: 

"PM's son and/or son-in-law is/are involved in the IIS tender. Is any of them behind Datasonic or MyEg.com or S5?"

A pro-Anwar political Blogger cum Facebooker had leads on Iris's game to win the NIIS tender. 

BENARKAH SYARIKAT MILIK KAKI JUDI, TERKAIT RASUAH LOBI TENDER BESAR KDN?

Shahbudin Husin

9 August 2020

Baru-baru ini seorang penulis blog pro bekas Perdana Menteri, Najib Razak telah menulis mengenai tender bernilai billion ringgit Kementerian Dalam Negeri (KDN) dan mengaitkannya dengan Menteri Dalam Negeri, Hamzah Zainuddin dan bekas menteri kementerian berkenaan, Muhyiddin Yassin yang kini sudah pun menjadi Perdana Menteri.


Dalam artikel tersebut, nama Muhyiddin dipetik secara jelas dan dikaitkan pula dengan ahli keluarga Perdana Menteri di mana sudah menjadi buah mulut pemain industri sejak tender tersebut ditutup pada Ogos tahun lalu.

Correction: Muhyiddin's and family members name was explicitly mentioned. However, it is not an accusation but curiosity on the unusual coverage by media on front runners. The bloggers cum Facebooker's lead linked it to current Home Minister.   

Tender Sistem Imigresen Bersepadu Nasional atau (NIISE) bernilai lebih satu bilion ringgit itu merupakan tender yang ditawarkan selepas KDN membatalkan kontrak Sistem Kawalan Imigresen Nasional (SKIN) bernilai RM3.5 bilion yang diberikan kepada Prestariang SKIN Sdn Bhd (PSSB).

Tender tersebut dibatalkan semasa zaman Muhyiddin menjadi Menteri Dalam Negeri dan ia belum sempat dianugerahkan kepada mana-mana syarikat kerana kompleksiti dan penilaian teknikal yang agak lebih ketat berbanding semasa zaman kerajaan BN terdahulu dimana ia dilakukan secara rundingan terus atau direct nego.

Selepas hampir setahun dan pelbagai proses penilaian teknikal dijalankan, tender tersebut kini dalam fasa terakhir sebelum ia mendapat lampu hijau daripada KDN.

Bagaimanapun, terdapat khabar angin yang tidak sedap didengar mula diperkatakan di kalangan pemain industri yang meluahkan rasa kurang senang apabila ada syarikat-syarikat yang mempunyai rekod tidak cantik dikatakan sedang berusaha keras menggunakan hubungan politik melobi dengan menabur janji kepada individu tertentu bagi tujuan memenangi tender tersebut.

Individu yang dilobi itu sudah pastinya adalah melibatkan Menteri Dalam Negeri sendiri dan ia telah diperkatakan dengan meluas, termasuk difahamkan melibatkan pemimpin muda sebuah sayap parti politik sebagai perantaranya.

Pemimpin muda yang dijadikan perantara itu difahamkan mempunyai hubungan dengan keluarga Hamzah.

Lebih menarik lagi, syarikat milik seorang kaki judi yang pernah dikaitkan dengan kes rasuah dalam projek e-pasport Republik Guinea menjadi nama yang hangat diperkatakan sedang melobi untuk memenangi tender itu.

Pemilik syarikat tersebut pernah disaman oleh syarikat kasino, Wynn Macau kerana berhutang sebanyak HK$33 million ($4.21 million) yang tidak dibayarnya pada 2017, malah bekas Timbalan Pengarah Urusan syarikat ini juga pernah ditahan Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia (SPRM) pada 2017 kerana penglibatan dalam skandal perniagaan di Republik Guinea.

Carian di internet sudah memadai untuk mengetahui mereka yang dimaksudkan itu.

Persoalannya, adakah Menteri Dalam Negeri akan mengulangi kesilapan sama dalam kes terdahulu yang melibatkan tender bernilai RM3.5 bilion yang diberikan kepada Prestariang SKIN Sdn Bhd (PSSB) secara rundingan terus?

Jika Muhyiddin sebelum ini membatalkan tender tersebut kerana diberikan secara rundingan terus dan mahukan satu sistem yang lebih baik digunapakai, adakah Hamzah yang baharu menerajui Kementerian Dalam Neger mahu melanggar aspirasi Perdana Menteri?

Atau adakah projek secara runding terus ini sebenarnya mahu diguna untuk memperolehi dana politik bagi menghadapi PRU15 akan datang seperti yang didakwa oleh penulis blog Anotherbrickinwall baru-baru ini?

Tahun lepas, blog ini ada menulis artikel berhubung isu tender ini apabila Muhyiddin selaku Menteri Dalam Negeri ketika itu telah mengadakan satu pertandingan golf di mana syarikat-syarikat pembida dijemput sekali untuk menyertainya.

Front runner? 


Though talk among businessmen is Home Ministry is a "fishing pond" for PPBM politicians, none is heard yet of Home Minister Dato Seri Hamzah Zainuddin interest in the tender. The sceptic and suspicious will say, "takkanlah tidak terlibat" (don't tell me he is not involve). 

Proof is not readily available. The hints and available links are interesting.     

Edge Online wrote in late June 2020 that S5 system is involved in the bids by MyEG, Iris and many other bidders. To quote an executive being reported by Edge, “Whoever wins the contract, S5 Systems [also] wins.” 

The media should investigate thoroughly who is behind S5. The real hands could likely be others not mentioned in official documents. 

Returning back to the blogger cum Facebooker posting, the Deputy Managing Director of Iris, Dato Hamdan Mohd Hassan was reported arrested by MACC for alleged graft involving 15-year e-passport contract for the Republic of Guinea in January 2017 as mentioned. Hamdan resigned in September that year.  

Subsequently, Iris founder, Dato Tan Say Jim sold his stake in the company and completely pulled out.  

Wynn Macau mentioned by the blogger exist. It is a luxury resort and casino hotel group operating in Macau. Back in January 2019, the new President and Group MD of Iris Corp, Datok Paul Poh Yang Hong had a judgement against him for failing to settle gambling debt for US$4.2 millon

Paul Poh became President and Group MD of Iris in June 2018. From a property man from Hong Leong Group, he set up his own outfit Caprice Capital, and GLM Reit Management. Felda Investment, and Paul Poh and Dato Rozabil holds 17% and 10% in Iris Corp, respectively. 

Rozabil is MD of Destini Berhad and was politically linked to Khairy Jamaluddin. Business-wise, he is in partnership with UMNO Kulim Bandar Baru Division head, Dato Aziz Sheikh Kadir.

Together with Dato Dr Zambery Kadir, former Perak MB and recently appointed Malaysia Airport Chairman, Aziz used to be the face leading Muhyiddin's campaign team for UMNO Deputy President.        
Blogger and Facebooker, Shahbudin Husin followed this story in his blog ever since a golf competition involving the bidders and then Home Minister last year. 

If the kaki judi he described is Paul Poh, then it is highly likely Iris is not only a bidder but now confirmed this week by Edge Weekly as one of the two front runner for the tender. Who could be that young politician allegedly acting as intermediary? 

Salam Maal Hijrah 1442 H

Syed Saddiq to quit politics

$
0
0

Despite scepticism over Syed Saddiq's intention to launch a youth party to contest for the upcoming 15th General Election, it created quite a buzz that over a wedding last weekend a young man was confidently claiming young voters will join in drove and support him. 

The young man must be a staunch believer as he gloat about how different, decisive, and independent  young voters are in their political views and demands. 

However, that narrative is not new and not unheard off. Graduates returning from abroad 40 years ago were expounding the same civil libertarian virtues. Where there is progression in the youth thinking in the past, today's youth lacked any sense of history, continuity and consistency in their thoughts. 

Youth and new voters created the tsunami that brought the mighty BN down in May 2018, but in a year, they changed preference and gave the cue for the fall of PH in March. A bit more than 100 days, the sentiment and rationale seemed to have shifted. 

Young and new voters comprise of more than 60% of voters. Syed Saddiq could make an impact should he be able to get his resources, organisation and message in place. Whether they could win any seats, it is yet to be seen, but to be a spoiler, his new party could do. 

Instead of downplaying Saddiq, Johor MB Dato Hasni Mohamed should ignore him. Hasni argued that BN could be a better voice for youth than the dedicated youth party  Frankly, the youth party is merely a script and transitional phase for Saddiq to take sabbatical leave from politics and save himself from being charged for money laundering. 

Betcha that Saddiq will suddenly show up with a letter of offer from Oxford University.  

Suspicious

It is suspicious for Saddiq to criticise PH with narratives used by BN last week. He criticised PH for cancelling assistance program from BN days for the people that led to their sufferings. In addition, he said PM7 was involved in money politics with his corporate cronies.     
 
While it is a relief that the cat is finally out of the bag and it came from the overzealous youth himself, the manner Tun Dr Mahathir expressed his disappointment is too suspicious. Mahathir said he respected Saddiq's decision and merely questioned the viability of relying only on youth voters to win seats. 

Mahathir said he does not know why the change in Saddiq, the PH-staunch supporter, who is now distancing himself from PH. 

Saddiq started changing his attitude when he withdrew himself from the legal challenge of the six sacked MPs of PPBM. The move by PPBM to sack Mahathir remain suspicious given Muhyiddin respect and hope for him to remain in the withdrawal from PH and new government to replace PH. 

Saddiq's withdrawal is more suspicious. The young man, who is known to remain in awe of Mahathir, to initially withdraw from being represented together by Hanif Khatri to have an own lawyer, JR Tey, whose a god-son of Tan Sri Vincant Tan, and then totally pull out from the lawsuit.      

Zainal Epi of MMO was more surprised by Mahathir for not angered of Saddiq's action. It led him to suspect that Mahathir and Saddiq may have a loose arrangement. Saddiq was present at Slim River to campaign for the independent candidate supported by Mahathir's under-application Pejuang party. 

There could be the possibility Saddiq is assigned to hold the youth voters as Mahathir rehabilitate the older voters whose turned sceptical and doubtful of him. Saddiq reaction is to remain respectful of Mahathir

Tan Sri Rafidah Aziz was harder in her response as she described Saddiq action as divisive. With PPBM split into read and black (now a party under Pejuang) and the number leaving the party is merely the hype of Reggie Jessie's Third Force portal, carving the youth voters out will only diminish further Mahathir's political strength. 

In an interview with Utusan Malaysia, Saddiq made an appealing line that his party will move away from old fashioned politics, as in the baggage of political ego between Mahathir and Muhyiddin, and not mentioned by Ssaddiq, past feuds between Mahathir and Anwar together with other leaders refusing to secede to his wishes.    

In addition to Saddiq's about turn view against PH, PPBM Youth positive response to Saddiq was interesting. Unlike UMNO and Amanah's response to invite Saddiq to their party, PPBM Youth congratulated him. as though in agreement with his ambition to revolutionise politics

Khairy took it positively as it is good competition to his grand old party, UMNO. He has been regularly seen on twitter and social media regularly meeting Nurul Izzah and Rafizi Ramli.    

This is a healthy public discourse on political education, but at the end of it all, the youth party has to be clear on its mission to survive the political landscape, remain relevant over time and alert on issues. 


Money laundering

Then there is also political funding. Saddiq said he is open to accept any political donation from any parties. 

It is only few months ago that Saddiq was caught in controversy over political funding. The same issue of 1MDB which he was vocal against. He made a police report over RM250,000 cash lost from his safe at home and that led to MACC raid on him and other members of PPBM Youth. 

It is already an open secret that Saddiq received political donation for Armada from Tan Sri Vincent Tan, who entered into a deal to take over the Dego ride championed by Saddiq when he was Youth Minister. 

Instead of the money was banked into party account, it went into his and PPBM Youth member safe. Saddiq could not give a sensible reason to the "lost" money from his safe and there is a money trail to his ASB account. 

It is a clear cut money laundering case and Saddiq is in hot soup. The fact that he dare to talk of political funding of his new party leads to the suspicion that his case will be KIV-ed and there have been an intervention. 

Back in mid-July, he was complimentary of MACC's treatment during his 11 hours interrogation. From the initial accusation of political persecution by Saddiq and other Mahathir aligned exco of PPBM Youth, Saddiq tone down his confrontation against MACC. 

That is only two months. After the ordeal, it is unthinkable for any mortal, more so a "budak", to hog the political limelight to start a new youth party. It makes one suspect he is being protected from persecution. 

It could only happen by the intervention of the Prime Minister or former Prime Minister get someone to make a call to either stop or slowdown investigation or brakes pulled up at any step of the way. It is too early to pinpoint at anyone or any government authorities, but keep one's ear close to the ground. 

The forecasted end-game will be Saddiq youth party will be a failure and he will phase out of limelight to go abroad to study. The change of heart at the court and youth party is a mere ploy as transition from being a Mahathir diehard to pull to the middle before disappearing. 

How will the case survive the MACC case review committee or AGC's scrutiny of the Investigation Paper will be to anyone's imagination?
    

Sabah sovereignty should be main election issue

$
0
0

Last Tuesday, the Court of Appeal decided to dismiss the appeal by Tan Sri Musa Aman and the 33 state assemblymen against the dissolution of Sabah state assembly by Governor, TYT Tun Juhah at the request of Chief Minister, Dato Seri Shafie Apdal. 

His appeal will have implication on the constitutional power of the ruler. Sabah Governor status is considered as representative of the Council of Rulers. 

Musa is still attempting to stop the poll through the court for his pending appeals in his tussle with Shafie. However, the practical expectation is to resume the Sabah snap election as earlier announced by Election Commission (EC) for nomination tomorrow, September 12th. If decisions had or turned up otherwise, EC would still apply to the court to continue election as scheduled. 

Musa can continue his legal bid to salvage his pride. It was his mistake to call for the press conference that set off alarm for Shafie to immediately dissolve the asssembly. 

Going back to the people for new mandate is the solution. More so, political parties began to announce the number of seats they are contesting and their candidates.  

Shafie's move to dissolve the state assembly is anticipated. It was surprising and unbecoming of both Musa and Dato Hamzah Zainuddin to miss that. 

Also anticipated is Phillipines repeating their claim on Sabah. 

It seemed to recur during state elections in Sabah. 

The last time Philippines made such claim was prior to GE14. Former Foreign Minister, Dato Anifah Aman outrightly rejected Phillipines last claim in February 2018 with the strongest message that it will be ignored. 

In 2015, it was merely a plain rejection from Anifah.

Feedback from Sabah indicate political wave against Warisan is on tsunami alert. It partly explains Warisan's refusal to Anwar's request for PKR to run in 25 seats to keep his waning Sabah for Sabahan crying call alive. 

The Philippine demand is bolder this time around thus raising the suspicion they are indirectly helping Shafie to rile support from Sabahans formerly of Philippine citizenship or with Filipino roots.   

Illegal immigrant 

Shafie is expected to reuse again the Sabah for Sabahan slogan used at GE14 and first used by PBS during their heydays. However, general sentiment in Sabah is that Warisan's real slogan is Sabah for Semporna or Sabah for Filipino Suluk. 

Shafie's nepotism is widespread that practically all important and strategic positions in Sabah state government are held by unqualified family members or those from Semporna.  

And, Shafie is revered by Filipinos, Sabahan of Suluk or Bajau Laut roots to the isles of Sulu Sea, and both illegal immigrants and stateless Filipino benefiting from massive state initiative to legalise their status using Pas Sementara Sabah (PSS).

PSS was a census program initiative by former PH Deputy Home Minister, Dato Azis Jamman from Warisan to document the illegal immigrant and legalise their presence. 

Sabahan generally suspect PSS is a ploy with the ulterior motive to whiten the mostly Filipino illegal immigrants, and the first step to secure citizenship enmass.

Indirect support

Warisan, who is facing several corner opposition and intense character attack on Shafie from BN, PN, and PCS, is heard planning to counter this sensitive issue by using the race and religion cards to pick on UMNO and PAS as bogey to stem the waning KDM votes. 

KDM is the commonly used abbreviation for the Kadazan, Dusun, Murut and including Rengus ethnics. Indication points to KDM outright rejection of Warisan. Though Warisan strength lies along the East Coast of Sabah, it could not hold fort without the KDM voters segment. 

Shafie and his bagman cum Warisan VP cum incumbent assemblymen for Melalap, Dato Peter Anthony face the prospect of a barrage of charges for MACC related offenses and long term imprisonment for his widespread corruption and swindling of state fund as Minister of Rural and Regional Development and short tenure as Chief Minister. 

The bold Philippines claim on Sabah leads to the suspicion Shafie is desperate and need the help to indirectly drum up statewide support from Projek IC recipients. 

Projek IC was the codename for mass issuance of Malaysian identity cards during Mahathir-Anwar BN government intended to oust PBS state government in the 1980s.  

The Phillipines Foreign Affair Secretary, Theodoro Locsin Jr announced to revive the previous office dedicated to reclaim Sabah

In July, Theodoro said Sabah "is not in Malaysia". Phillipines' house foreign committee claimed Sabah is part of their Economic Exclusive Zone. Foreign Minister, Dato Hishamuddin Hussein Onn immediately responded to call on the Philippines Ambassador to explain.  

Philippines aggressive stand has political nuances as Theodoro claimed opposition parties in Malaysia offered bribes to past Philippines Presidential hopefuls to drop Sabah claim. 

Diplomatic oversight

Their aggressive stands may have been encouraged by Shafie's naivety to send Sabah state legal officio and ex-officio as observer to attend an event on their claim on Sabah. 

Anifah lambasted Shafie as reckless and ignorant to reveal he had agreed to bring the matter for arbitration in an international court

In his August 26th statement, he revealed Shafie send a team to defend Sabah sovereignty at the International Court in Spain, in which could only be expected of state level legal officer to lose and the ruling favoured Philippines. 

To cover-up for the cock-up and Anifah's earlier critic for Shafie's silence on Philippines claim, Shafie blame Anifah as not doing anything as Foreign Minister to address the Philippines claim. 

Anifah persistently pursued Shafie for the gross diplomatic oversight.   

It was futile for Shafie and Azis Jamman to attempt cover-up with blame game. 

They were bombarded with critics from analyst Abdul Jalil Gani, PCS Youth Chief Haziq Mursidi, Women Chief Dr Regina Lim, and Treasurer Terence Simbun

In diplomatic and Spanish legal language, Shafie's actions acknowledged Phillipines claim

All along their demand has no relevance since United Nation recognised Sabahans choice to join Malaysia in September 1963 as determined by a referendum carried out by the Cobbold Commission under auspices of United Nation.

Empowering Suluk 

Shafie's foolish action may have been motivated to seek political glory as the Sabah leader to finally addressed the longstanding illegal immigrant problem and Philippines claim on Sabah.  

However, there are reasons to believe that Shafie is not as naive as Anifah had criticised him for. 

There is a widespread believe that Shafie was born on the Philippine island of Tawi-Tawi near Palawan and informed sources claimed his father worked as policeman in Zamboanga. He was upset with allegations on his ancestary.    

Shafie overzealousness to seek immediate resolution to the illegal immigrant problem stemmed from his long held ambition to be Chief Minister at all cost, and revealed intention to dominate Sabah politics by empowering the Bajau Laut or Suluk ethnic and drastically enlarging the number of voters.  

Under Mahathir-Anwar administration, the Projek IC offered citizenship to illegals and the presence of widespread new voters systematically weaken PBS. During the RCI on Projek IC, only Shafie expressed caution on any drastic action to be undertaken by the authorities. He was noticeably defensive of illegal immigrants. 

During his 26 months as CM, he has aggresively embarked on Projek IC II and complimented it with social programs that favoured those intended for naturalisations. Naturally, Philippinies favoured Shafie for taking potential problems of their shoulders. 

Since the fall of PH, PSS has been cancelled and Hamzah has reinstated IMM3. It is still not acceptable to original Sabahans. 

Anifah said there are better and more effective solution in other countries that have not been explored to address illegal immigration problems. 

Sabah sovereignty

In an interview published by NST on August 10th, Anifah stressed that current economic and political uncertainties, and MA63 as part of an economic solution will not be possible, "if we don't have peace and security, as well as a government to claim our rights as enshrined in MA63".

The extreme interpretation to Anifah is that problems and solutions to Sabah will not be met should the state is lost to other country.  

Issues to be raised against the incumbent Warissan-led government ranged from the poor performance of economy, handling of Corona Covid pandemic assistance, Semporna nepotism and rampant and blatant corruption. 

Warisan is likely to paint the opposition as party Malaya, racist and religious bigots, spin allegation against BN's past including digging up dirt on Musa's administration, relentless blame game, and falsify claims they resolved most of the MA63 issue.  

Still does not compare to losing their sovereignty. 

Aside from the Philippines claim, Shafie has seceded Sabah interest to China economic control. This is the explanation to his and other Warisan leaders confidence to claim Sabah do not need federal budget to carry several ambitous mega projects. 

This adds to the threat of China's frequent encroachment into Sabah water. Sabah is Malaysia's frontline state to any possible military aggression by the superpower. During the nationwide Corona pandemic lockdown, there was a several incidences of China navy incursions revealed in July.  

The other political parties should be united take up this issue against Warisan as it concerns Sabah future existence. Sovereignty issue far exceed any concern on Sabah right under MA63, certain autonomy status, and illegal immigrant problems. 

The threat seemed far fetch to those not keeping up with developments. It is real and not intended to be alarmist. All political parties, NGOs and community leaders should raise the risk of Sabahans losing their state. It should not be left to smallish party PCS to take up this concern, 

Contrary to earlier predication that PCS could only secure 3 seats, Anifah announced an ambitious plan to run in 72 out of 73 contested seats yesterday. PCS is destined to run against coalitions of PN, BN and Warisan Plus.  

Anifah has a long held position that Sabah and Sarawak has only 56 seats in Parliament and need to have a harmonious relation with the Federal government. 

That's another political problem lurking as there is the rising possibility of rampant multi-corner fights that will only improve Warisan's chance. The post-election horse trading to form the next government will be interesting. 

In the meantime, how will the parties stack up against each other and the deployment of resources for their campaign under Corona Covid pandemic health restriction. 

SilTerra: Selling local or foreign, where is the national objective?

$
0
0

Back in November 2018, after the fall of BN government and under the early part of PH government, there was news report by Malaysia Reserve that a Chinese microelectronic producer selected SilTerra as a key strategic partner to produce 8-inch wafer. 

Wafer is a thin slice of semi-conductor used for fabrication of integrated circuits and in photovoltaic, to manufacture solar cells. 

Despite facing heavy critique as one of the many big idea failures of Tun Dr Mahathir, the Khazanah owned wafer fabrication plant in Kulim was being acknowledged by China for its 20 years experience for independently running a fabrication plant. 

It is a testimony of Malaysian can do spirit. SilTerrra inked a technology transfer partnership with a Singapore based technology developer in December the same year. They are exploring at opportunities in life science. Money pumped under Najib administration was beginning to generate profitability.   

However, the financial side have accumulated more losses to the billions left by Mahathir administration and it has been haunting Khazanah. In his departing statement that same year, former Khazanah CEO, Tan Sri Azman Mokhtar highlighted SilTerra as one of his many failure to fulfill his turnaround assignments. 

The other being Malaysia Airline. 

For that matter, Khazanah also under failed to operationally turnaround Proton, and UEM. It was only expected because expertise of Khazanah is not in the operation but purely in financial. 

The turnaround route undertaken by Khazanah for UEM and Proton are undertaken usually via debt and corporate restructuring. In the case UEM, the troubled company was delisted and a profitable subsidiary tookover its listing status. While, for the case of Proton, Gealy was brought in as JV partner. 

For MAS and UEM, the accumulated problem remained unresolved. Proton has a better fighting chance with R&D input and hopefully, upgrading its marketing could eventually turn it into profitability and rid off its losses. However, Najib administration faced a barrage of critique for "selling out" national asset to China.  

Ironically, it was during PH administration that a massive sales of national assets was happening. They faced problems arising from foreign investors bailout across all financial markets that led to marked to market accounting compliance issues, and exacerbated by political witch hunting. 

As PH Economic Affairs Minister, Dato Seri Azmin Ali politicised the losses faced by Khazanah which brought a strong response by Dato Najib for failing to understand that the return from Khazanah other investment helps to keep sustain operations like SilTerra as turnaround effort are being undertaken.  

Divesting SilTerra

Since February this year, new CEO Dato Shahril Ridza Ridzuan has began its divestment program on SilTerra as part of their new strategy to sell non-core assets. Since 2016, Dato Najib said government then was open to having foreign partners

The Star reported two local companies - Dnex and Green Packet have put their bids, but late entries by two semi-conductor giant, Foxcomm from Taiwan and X-FAB from Germany have brought about a change of thought on the part of Khazanah and government. 

The two bids came at a higher price but with different conditions than the one that attracted the two local bidders. It seems the significantly higher bid could be changing Khazanah's mind from minority stake by foreigners to majority control. 

Geeen Packet minority shareholder is Dongfang Huijia, a China state owned central financial enterprise. While DNex partner is a fund manager that is a proxy of the China's IC industry.     

Public uproar for the sales of another national asset to foreigner is beginning to emerge again. Perikatan Nasional led government should reconsider and not repeat the mistake of the failed PH government.   

Two newspapers reported to express opposition to the sales. NST titled the article with a title outrightly demanding to keep it local. 

The arguement put forward is the replacement cost of US$1 billion to build another wafer fabrication plan maybe out of reach for Malaysians in the future. Malaysia could be left out completely from the electronic sector. 

Berita Harian puts it as wafer fabrication plant as essential to remain relevant in the electric and electronic sector. The sales would mean Malaysia will be out of the industry and miss out on the development in the IoT (Internet of Thing), 5G, and increasing digitalisation. 

The current pandemic crisis have led to a new normal living condition or precisely abnormal condition in which human interaction and travel will be significantly lessen and ICT will play a more significant role in everyday life.           

Both newspaper argued that Malaysia stand to benefit more through the two local bidders with minority partners from China than direct foreign bidder. Both will purchase Khazanah's equity and inject  working capital and payoff debt. For instance, Dnex will be pumping RM500 million.     

Unlike the other turnaround, SilTerra is a technology company in which Malaysia had always a leading position. Malaysia was one of the largest exporter of high-end semiconductor chips. It slack back in the 1990s as new countries begin to catch up. 

SilTerra was part of the effort to revitalise the industry. To stay ahead, Malaysia need to develop it indigenous technological capability. The initial problem was SilTerra was "a revolving doors of CEOs" and that hampered its progress. 

It has actually been turned around and branching out to life science. Despite the ups and downs, Malaysia still have a flourishing semiconductor industry. It would be foolish to bailout of SilTerra to purely address Khazanah inability to turnaround companies but cause a big loss to the nation. 

An interesting trend in semiconductor, said by SilTerra CEO, Firdaus Abdullah last year, is the opportunity to go into physical domains

Malaysia has lots of IC design engineers. SilTerra could enable SMEs to develop new technologies. With the political will for nationbuilding and allow the technologist to innovate and develop, an ecosystem from researchers to chip makers, could be developed. 

Policymakers and financiers must shift their mindset from marketing someone else's technology to thinking more about real technology. Foxcomm and X-FAB are still contract manufacturer for major companies. There is no added value to Malaysia. 

Rethinking Khazanah

Khazanah was originally established to acquire and develop technology needed to increase the nation's technological capability to remain relevant and give it the edge. At the end of Mahathir's first term as Prime Minister and under Tun Abdullah, it was made into warehouse to store forced acquisition of privatised companies and the term GLC became the buzzword. 

Come Najib administration, Khazanah was transformed into a sovereign wealth fund and Azman Mokhtar's annual report repeatedly emphasised its asset growth and highlighted its return. The accountants and investment bankers were unable to appreciate the nation building emphasis on capability, capacity and growth potential. 

The overemphasis on meeting set numbers for return, asset size and quality, and return on investment will not reflect the benefit to the nation in term of jobs, expertise, SMEs, industry development, and local and national economic spillover. 

Khazanah become more myopic in its role to be merely revenue for government coffer. Khazanah is wholly owned by the government. Government under the new administration as shareholder need to look beyond the financial of only Khazanah but the nation interest as a whole. 

Tan Sri Muhyiddin should set his eye beyond the problem and challenges directly related to the health issue arising the Covid Corona virus. Whether the pandemic is over or not soon, he should have a plan. 

If it will be around as WHO predicted to be next 4 to 5 years, Malaysia must be thinking of being self sufficient and self reliant. It means the trading nation model that have prospered the Malay archipelago since the Melaka empire need a rethink.  

The implimentation of 5G in Malaysia is expected to generate RM12.9 billion to GDP growth and generate 39,000 new jobs. Without platform such as SilTerra to retain the money spent in the country and increase national wealth, it is an effort that will only benefit other countries. 

The claimed Foxcom valuation of US$125 million looks attractive but it is short termish and myopic to merely sell it away. Since Khazanah failed to do it, let them take the hit but pass SilTerra to other locals with the capacity and capability to carry it through and make it beneficial to the nation. 

Khazanah selfish interest should not deny Malaysia of SilTerra's potential benefit.


Will the independents displace UMNO candidates in 11 constituencies?

$
0
0

Campaign for the Sabah state election ended midnight last night. Any campaigning will only be online and last minute whispering reminders. 

Provision of transport as in Peninsular Malaysia is not widely practised in Sabah as it is physically limiting and political parties merely give supporters money to arrange their own transport. That money should be considered corruption as it is usually more than required. There could be bidding war between competing parties. 

In Sabah political circle, they are quite upfront and it means the practise is a norm and widespread, particularly in the rural parts of Sabah. The size of the so-called transport money and being the last to pay before polling could determine the outcome. 

Information received this afternoon Warisan has been aggressively dishing out transport money to add to their widespread and large posters, banners and flags. It is to compensate their overwhelming disadvantaged position in the campaign issue. 

Overwhelming Sentiment

Dato Seri Shafie Apdal is an excellent campaigner, Bapa Pengumuman in announcing promises not intended to fulfill, and unflinching in his hypocritical claims, but the general sentiment before campaign started in the north, interior and west coast are overwhelmingly against him.

There were heavy bombardment of revelations of wrongdoings by opposition against the ruling Warisan-dominated coalition led by Chief Minister Shafie. Unlike GE14, Warisan is not riding on the wave of hope and confidence. 

For a ruling party, Warisan's campaign was not presenting their achievement but strangely, went on the attack with their openly and hypcritical anti-Malaya sentiment to blame for Sabah's underdeveloped condition, corruption allegations aimed at Tan Sri Musa Aman and practically blaming everything to the out frogged BN government.  

Most of the allegations are generally half truth, fake news and hypocritical, which led to character attack on Shafie's character, corruption allegations, and reputation. Too few are justified and not sentiment play.  

Counter attack

Shafie is under stress that his face is tense and seen as desperate. He has reached paranoia to pick on Dato Anifah Aman, whose party is smallish despite running for 73 seats.    

Warisan had to counter the blatant corruption and power abuse allegations, poor economic management, compromised sovereignty cock-up, Semporna nepotism, and widespread citizenship to illegal immigrants by riling anti-Malaya and religious sentiments. 

Loaded war chest from swindling state projects done blatantly throughout Shafie's 8 years at Rurul and Regional Development Ministry and 26 months as Chief Minister together with assistance from Tun Dr Mahathir's corporate cronies, Warisan can afford to shop.    


To prepare the public and partly as campaign psywar, Warisan is creating a winning perception. Posters, banners and pamphlets are more prevalently seen than Federal government ruling parties. 

Social media beefed up by alleged service of 5 key RBA operators for RM500,000. Mahathir and crony gave Warisan the national and longer TV media coverage. There are also opinion surveys by questionable independent surveyors to help sway a winning sentiment for Warisan. Pro-Amanah Ilham Center twiced announced results to favour Warisan

Another outfit, the newbie SEEDS changed their reading from favouring BN and praising Tan Sri Muhyiddin for their pre-election survey to conclude their second survey with leaning for Warisan. Their latest lean towards Gabungan Rakyat Sabah (GRS).     

Whichever the surveyors, sampling is questionable as it is small and limited randomness to reach the diverse voters segment.  

Caught red-handed

Shafie's immediate response to Dato Mohammad Katapi verbal screw-up to insult the service personnel for Lahad Datu incursion in 2013 was him giving playing down as small mistake, apologising for him, and offering RM10 million of state fund for "frontliners". 

That was not the likely arrangement as the next day 2 servicemen were caught by their mate and handed in to MACC for giving political bribes to servicement. It proves Shafie and Warisan are buying their victory. 

Whether it will be a legal case, it is another matter. For many years, Shafie wiggled out of billion-dollar corruption investigation by buying investigators and Mahathir's help got then AG and MACC Chief to pull the brakes. What is there to vote buying?     

Frankly, it beyond the logistical capacity of MACC or EC to monitor or apprehend wrongdoers. 

Only difference this time could be the close scrutiny of NRIC and document by immigration and police on the way to polling centres for suspected illegal immigrants with fake citizenship documents. 

It will require a major deployment of manpower to target wide areas of Sabah East Coast and specific areas in the West Coast. It could also include blocking border entry via the sea. 

The political operator for PPBM and PN, and Home Minister, Dato Hamzah Zainuddin spare no effort to deny Warisan a win.  

M Katapi was a setback for Warisan with early voting the next day, but Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim's announcement the same day confused all sides. For Shafie, Lim Guan Eng's about turn from supporting Shafie for premiership to Anwar if he can get the number, was not helpful to Warisan.

Certain side in BN claim it was leading but Anwar's announcement coupled with Zahid's statement to claim himself  helpless should any UMNO MP support Anwar is shaking its campaign. Without pondering deeply, they presume it will favour Warisan. 

Actually, Sabahan generally do not believe Anwar and disregarded him as liar. It is money that was falling like rain yesterday that have the influence. Unless Anwar has foreign power backing, new Malaysia's power over policy will not favour him as PM.     

Muhyiddin's verbal diatride

Tan Sri Muhyiddin was taken aback by Anwar's claim that he lost government and Istana's statement of Agong's accepting a planned audience a day earlier (but only postphoned by a week till his Highness is out of IJN). 

Muhyiddin recovered in time to deliver the finale yesterday at Tambunan, the place PN's Deputy Chairman and STAR President, Dato Dr Jeffrey Kitingan will smooth sail in his brother's former constituency and PBS historical constituency. 

His online publicist promoted Muhyiddin expressing confidence that GRS will win the state election and lead the state leadership. He, who responded to Anwar with the remark "I am still the Prime Minister", touched on the episode: 


It was an almost direct message to UMNO that PPBM wants to the Chief Minister post for PPBM's Hajiji.  

Denying UMNO

PPBM did not go head-on against UMNO. 

However, it is suspected that either PPBM or Tan Sri Musa Aman for different reasons placed 11 out of the 56 independent candidates against UMNO candidates. They comprised of former UMNO Division Chiefs or recently resigned PPBM Division Chief against UMNO candidates. 

All the independents are well funded and had campaign paraphenalia matching BN or even Warisan. There were those aggressive in giving transport money and are formidable candidates. 

They remain influential since their days in UMNO such as Dato Musbah Jamil of Tampasuk, Kota Belud and Rubin Balang of Kemabung, Tenom. 

The true identity of their political alignments will only be known few days after the result. There is the possibility that certain elder leaders are opposing the passing down of power to the next generation. 

It is UMNO and PCS that is all for giving opportunity for young and new leaders. It made GRS suspicious that UMNO and PCS may tie up together to lead the state should the number be sufficient. It is difficult to deny it is a strategy to deny UMNO the seats but maintain power within GRS coalition 

UMNO President Dato Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi is quite unhappy with the prevalent underhanded development of conspiring to weaken his party. Other than the independents, UMNO candidates had to face STAR and PBS candidates. 

Hamzah Zainuddin brokered for STAR and PBS mutual withdrawal but not for cases of seats contested against UMNO. Tan Sri Annuar Musa noticed this Sabah style of political manouvering early. It was confirmed when PBS signed entry into PBS in the midst of election. 

Shooting feet for a friend?


UMNO members noticed the deceiving manner PN election logo colours emulate BN's and deceptive manner the dacing was placed to the left of PN's worded logo to deceive Sabahans with strong sentiment for BN's logo to make them comfortable to vote PN. 

More suspicious was Muhyiddin's distasteful gloating of himself as the most popular Abah. 

And, he threaten to deny assistance and development allocation to constituency not voting BN and PN. Dato Bung Mokhtar admitted BN has changed and Muhyiddin is reverting back to the unconstitutional act of the past. 

It raised suspicion of his shooting his feet to give his "friend" and he rather have Warisan win than make "Undi balik" BN campaign a reality. 

And there is suspicion he is in collusion with Anwar. Whispering along the corridors of Parliament is after Anwar's visit to his office during MCO, he has in return visited Anwar several times. The Prime Minister stooped to go meet Anwar.    

Anwar's confidence to announce he has the number could spring surprise that Zahid Hamidi's tricky remark. To be discusses after the result later.

Shafie has obviously has limited Anwar and PKR to merely 7 tough seats versus 25 requested by the formerly most dominant opposition of Sabah. It served PN's election purpose to deny Anwar.

And to circumvent that Anwar has parked his several of his loyal men to run under USNO tickets since the returning grand old party of Sabah 47 contested seats.  

LDP is also part of Tun Dr Mahathir's extended hands as it is believed Chong Kah Kiat is funded by Mahathir's corporate cronies to sabotage on PKR and DAP. His campaign is well funded and have been a rainmaker for the last few days. 

After election, labelled as recycled LDP could only be expected to join Warisan PLUS.   

Vote splitting   


There is only 73 seats but 447 candidates. One would expect vote splitting is at work especially through the 56 Bebas candidates and proxy parties and realignments of independent candidates and independent parties into ruling and opposition parties and coalition after the result.   

The opposition seemed divided due to the disrupting presence of PPBM in which all but one of the BN state assemblymen crossed over to PPBM and PH after GE14. The "power sharing" arrangement at federal level forced UMNO to secede seats to PPBM.         

BN coalition in Sabah cracked as only PBRS remained in BN and others left the coalition. UPKO crossed over to PH and gave Warisan the majority to wrest power from BN. Subsequently PBS pulled out of BN. 

UMNO announced its decision to not join the PN coalition but PN managed to get STAR, SAPP and this week, PBS to join. The coalition for the election named by Tan Sri Muhyiddin as Gabungan Rakyat Sabah make up of BN, PN and PBS. BN is running in 41 seats, PN in 29 seats and PBS in 22 originally. 

The dispute between STAR and PBS came about because the bigger party PBS insisted in dominating 30 of the 33 non-Muslim KDM seats. However, STAR took the view PBS is weakening due to leaadership vacuum and demanded 18 seats instead of the 5 allocated and end up running in 22 seats. PBS retaliated announced running in 22 seats agsinst the allocated 8 seats.   

Other than their clash, they were denying UMNO in few seats. On the other hand, UMNO responded to denial of their seats by STAR in Liawan, Keningau by backing PCS and in Kuala Penyu, Beufort local UMNO leader ran as independent. 

PCS wave 


The headturner for this election must be PCS that ran the highest number of 72 seats in which 90% of candidates are local and not based in Kota Kinabalu or Australia. The average age is 40 and most are comprise of professionals, academics, community leaders, youth and idealist seeking politicians.


Political ideologies and philosophies take a back seat as leaders focus on retaining and defending their positions, never mind the voters who are hungry for development to make their lives better. 

However, Datuk Seri Anifah Aman seems to have introduced a new brand of politics with Parti Cinta Sabah (PCS) that may appeal to the new young voters and old voters who are fed-up with the power struggle at the top. 

Fielding 73 candidates with about 90 per cent in their forties, he has remodelled the Sabah for Sabahans motto used by Parti Bersatu Sabah (PBS) in 1985 and Warisan in 2018 by rallying the local professionals to participate and take the lead. 

A young party where even Anifah himself seems not to be interested to become chief minister. He seems to be keen on leading young professionals and getting them to take an active role in charting the state’s future. 

The move may not jive with the other political parties that are contesting but Anifah may find his party becoming the king maker that will tilt the balance of victory. 

Multi-racial, multi-religious, and full of young professionals who are locals, PCS may be what Sabahans need. 

Anifah may even introduce a young new face to lead the state.

If Sabahan is seriously considering for a local party, PCS is the choice over Warisan for a wind of change. For now, young Sabahan is generally not against relation with Federal government so election is also about relationship with federal government. 

Dato Seri Anifah made no bone of his good relationship with BN, PPBM and its leaders. However, local observers has mixed opinions. Some considered as half baked and some see it as as potential but need time to develop

A BN-PCS state government would be the dream team. But with the heay rain the last few days, PCS could be drenched. 

Prediction       


After last weekend and going into the second week of campaign, curiosity is building on the possible outcome of the Sabah snap election. This time it is too complex to predict because all 73 seats contested are multi-cornered and many underlying forces are in play.  

There are layers of political manouvering to split the votes of opponents. The independents pitted against UMNO could mean GRS losing to Warisan Plus, who seemed solid in view of GRS in-fighting. However, it is still too complex with overwhelming sentiment against Warisan built up over a year, at least. 

Despite all the surveys and psywars of possible leads, Zainal Epi's prediction that it is everyone's game is more believable Anything could happen overnight despite Anwar's surprise and Katapi's setback.  

Generally, east coast is under Warisan control, west coast is predominantly BN, and interior will be PCS, STAR and PBS. As much as one hope for BN to return by virtue of its wider presence and stronger machinery, multicorner fights deem common analysis and forecasting as irrelevant. 

Money could certainly transport the world around, and sentiment for local party could tilt towards the  well funded and media backed Warisan.     

The consensus is that the absence of dominant party leading GRS and should there be no significant majority tomorrow for either Warisan or BN-PN or possible between winner BN and PN, Kota Kinabalu's commodity market trading floor for state assembly seats will be open for business tomorrow. 

Election is not over with the results. Happy trading.

No brake pulling on road maintainance investigation, Hajiji!

$
0
0


Its only 2 days after Dato Hajiji Mohd Nor took his pledge as Sabah Chief Minister and a day after an equally tumoultous conclusion prior to pledge taking by members of the consensus-ly agreed Sabah cabinet to the TYT Sabah Governor. 

Sabahkini 2 has already rervived the issue of the RM1.5 billion road maintainence contract from Sabah Road Work Department (JKR) yesterday. The election turning news portal that was years ahead of politicians in the fight to bring Dato Seri Shafie Apdal down wasted no time to whip the new cabinet back to this contentious issue. 

The federal constitution has provision that obliged the federal government to annual allocation for maintainance of roads according to a prescribed formula. 

Sabahkini2 was the portal that first revealed  the massive swindeling of fund for public's basic needs for proper roads happening under the eyes of former Chief Minister, Dato Seri Shafie Apdal and his Minister for Infrastructure, Peter Anthony in 2018. 

The contravention on the constitution by Shafie was re-exposed again May 2020 by Sabahkini2. The matter arise from the second series of Chief Auditor Report 2018. Two companies closely linked and practically crony to Peter was highlighted, including possible money trails. 

Words going around is that the companies are paid regularly on schedule without details on the voucher instead of on claim basis. It means money was paid for no work done. A common method of swindeling money meant for public works in third world country. 

Sabahkini2's persistence seem to be in-sync with sentiment on social media as there are commentators giving hint new CM Hajiji will be soft and not have the guts to undertake investigation and pursue on the perpetrators. 

Interference

Hamzah dashed out as Bung ready himself for a slugfest
Hamzah dashed out as Bung ready himself for a slugfest

One can suspect the ground knows more than that as there were more than meet the eyes in the incident, in which Home Minister, Dato Hamzah Zainuddin was heard and widely reported on social media to interfere and persistently demand Dato Bung Mokhtar not be given to the agreed positions. 

It was agreed during pre-election negotiation that UMNO was to be given the CM position should it holds the most number of seats and subsequently conceded to consensually agree Bung be given the second best option of Deputy CM 1 and Infrastructure Minister. 

When the time comes to read the pledge, Hamzah interfered again and again. 

Knowing the feisty former street fighter Bung is, one should not be surprise he could finally lose his patience and ready himself for a slugfest in the ceremonial hall. 

Hamzah had repeatedly negated on several promises and agreements in the BN-PN pact in exchange for the concession given to PN by BN and systematically sabotaged BN's campaign to lose out 12 seats by pitting other PN component parties or independent proxies.

Bung was accused of being weak in his negotiation, but sources close and present at the scene revealed that he was threatened to the extent that the execution of the threat of arrest was to be executed while the state election campaign was going on. 

It could have jeopardised BN's chance and also PN's. That made Bung relented with conditions agreed.  

The long and short story, Bung eventually got the consensually agreed positions after Hamzah dashed out of the room in fear. 

Social media reported that Dato Ahmad Zahid threatened to have BN pull out of government within one hour for the last renegade. A source within UMNO confirmed the announcement was to be made concurrently in Kota Kinabalu and Kuala Lumpur. He had personally prepared the statement. 

It maybe the reason Muhyiddin had to change his mind from holding the snap general election after a win of the Sabah snap election said during the campaign following questions from media.     

Like Shafie to Mahathir, do not be surprise he cry baby to mengadu (report) the incident immediately to Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin.   

Eyewitness said the state assemblymen across the partisan divide were increasingly annoyed by the interference by a non-Sabahan representing and given mandate by Tan Sri Muhyuddin to deal, and decide but uncustomarily over-ride agreed decision. 

Well deserved dual position for CM material Marsidi Manjung

The incidence raised suspicion on Hamzah's unministerial behaviour. 

Why did Hamzah interfere? 

Did Hamzah made the decision to interfere in such uncouth and gung-ho manner out of mere political consideration? 

Hamzah is not sufficiently conversant on Sabah affairs and far from being meticulous in his actions albeit the completely shameful failure of the coup d'etat on Shafie's Warisan government. It is unlikely he is aware of the nuances of the position. 

Is someone too afraid Bung would know the crap happening in the Sabah Work's Department in particularly road maintainance contract? 

When Sabahkini2 first leak the information earlier in 2018, Mahathir-aligned Berita Harian attempted to politically cleansed Shafie.   

Bearing in mind, prior to the fall of PH government, PPBM is inside PH and beckbencher for the Warisan government. 


During campaign, Dato Najib raised in his FB on September 18th to demand answer for the contract and this named four shady companies. He reminded of Peter's threat to sue Sabahkin2 but failed to do so. Following the silence of Warisan, Najib raised the same constitutional infringement again three days later. 

In case someone forgotten, Najib was Prime Minister and Minister of Finance for 8 years. Does he know something more than what common Sabahan folks and politicians? 

Hajiji should not be pulling any brakes on the investigation of the road maintainence contract. This is Sabah's rights guranteed under the federal constitution and more binding the Malaysia Agreement 1963.  

Otherwise, he could be accused as the person instigating Hamzah's buffonic act to interfere in Sabah matter and renegade on promises after promises made to UMNO. If it is not Hajiji himself, someone else may have directed Hamzah to be an @$$h*le. Who?   

Hamzah is not that clever ... Documents are scattered all over. 


Is the government into rethinking of global supply chain and state of the economy?

$
0
0


In the office today re-reading yesterday's The Star column by Anthony Dass entitled A need to rethink global supply chains, it reminded of a Chairman message for a PLC meant for their 2020 Annual Report.   

The Chairman wrote that the world is undergoing a transformtion of epic proportion due to the Corona Covid 19 pandemic. 

Contrary to the victorious chest thumping by politicians, civil servants, and public at large several months ago, he felt the world is not yet out of the woods. People are wary of other people around them and what used to work does not work the same way anymore.

Upon analysing the current social trend, he predicted trend towards remote mode of working, accelerated use of technology, roll back in globalisation, and need for self reliant and self sufficiency for goods and services. The world will be re-prioritising its needs.    

That is where he meets the view of Anthony Dass, who viewed the pandemic reversed globalisation and stiffled global investment and trade. FDI for 2020 to 2010 is expected to drop by 40%. Cross border M&A will continue to decline. 

In the past, nation's concern is to keep foreign companies from dominating the provision of good and services. The new challenge now is to keep critical goods and services available within the country. 

Businesses are changing and adapting to the new business ecosystem. Countries are increasingly looking inward. He concluded with government should draw up policies and strategies to strengthen economic and business cooperation with partner countries in an “innovative” way.

Dass's article reproduced at end of posting.

This should set all of us to ponder as to what are we in Malaysia are doing other than the current national leadership endlessly gloating their only success to address health emergency beyond gigantic proportion. 

Then there is the public wanting to get spooked by new surges of positive infection, endless blame against each others, and non-stop politics to satisfy the insatiable appetite for power by the small since GE14 in May 2018. 

Googling to search for Dass's online version of the article, it generated long list of discussions on the subject of global rethinking of supply chain. It is a major concern of businesses and academics globally. Suppyminded.com provides an excellent overview here

MIT's Sloan School is talking about rethinking global supply chain from the perspective of improving resilience for future shocks. University of Brmingham's Birmingham Business School blog enlisted four generic strategies to improve global supply chain including the resilence and flexibility stressed by Sloane School.   

Talking of dependence on a single source, Ajot.com raised the issue of single source risk of being heavily  dependent on China across the industry vertical and relooking cost to service trade-off.  Outsourcing does not solve the problems in its entirety.  

Despite views such as in businessfacilities.com cautioning the impracticality against flipping the switch to shut off supply source from China, the US-China trade war is making companies rethinking of their reliance on low cost China to migrate to other countries. 

According to supplychainbrian.com, the pandemic made them re-examine that standard supply chain strategic option to question on the aspect of reliability.

Taking the definition from cips.com, global supply chains are networks that can span across multiple continents and countries for the purpose of sourcing and supplying goods and services. Global supply chains involve the flow of information, processes and resources across the globe.

As the 16th trading nation and surviving for more than 500 years on that model, Malaysia is part and parcel of of the global supply chain, be it as a manufacturing base, Straits of Malacca sea-lane, ports, sourcing of raw materials, and consumer of intermediate, or semi-finished or furnished goods.  

The Malaysian economy depended on trade and will continue to depend on it. It means being a part of the global supply chain. 

With FDI on the plummet, barriers being put up, economic war between US and China lurking, border intrusions that put our sovereignty at risk, and insufficient resources relevant for today's economy, one wonders whether the government is concern and thinking hard enough of these serious challenges. 

The national leadership should be providing that guiding light for the nation. The least they should do is to be concern on where to get our food and how to pay for it.

If the country could survive for 14 days with PM, 7 Ministers and 6 Deputy Ministers under quarantine, maybe there is no need for political leadership. 

They could not even ponder what is needed by the country.     

-----------------

Insight - A need to rethink global supply chains

ECONOMY

Tuesday, 06 Oct 2020

AmBank's Anthony Dass: Firms and governments need to rethink to ensure resilience in global supply chains following the impact of Covid-19.

THE unprecedented Covid-19 pandemic may have shattered the fantasy of those who championed globalisation and promised a world of winners, a more inter-connected society and international cooperation.

The pandemic has shown how the global community is heavily interconnected and vulnerable with a change in the behaviour.

Not a single country, no matter how powerful or prosperous, can overcome this cross-border pandemic alone.

This pandemic has resulted in political, economic, social and cultural shifts that changed the global landscape.

This is certainly worrying.

And it appears to be accelerating the deglobalisation process and already hurting global investment and trade.

Expectations are that global foreign direct investment (FDI) flows may fall by 40% in 2020-21.

Cross-border mergers and acquisitions will continue to decline.

How severe the impact on global investment and trade flow depends on the degree to which restrictive measures become binding and supply chains being relocated to home markets.

The placing of restrictions and screening on investment and trade are not new but the scope of their expansion is.

Prior to the pandemic, screening was justified on the fear of becoming dependent on a foreign company for the delivery of critical goods and services, a desire to ensure that domestic technology and expertise remain within national borders and the prevention of surveillance or sabotage of essential services.

Today, the pandemic has added a new dimension to these insecurities that will have global ramifications on investment and trade flows.

Change and adapt

As a result of the pandemic virus, there is a need to change and adapt to the new business ecosystem.

The goalposts have definitely moved.

Fundamentals in global supply value chains have changed in reaction to global supply disruptions.

Industries are reorienting and diversifying their lines of production, expanding the scope of their cooperation across borders to better adapt to the changing global supply and demand shock.

They are remodelling as they start reviewing business strategies, operation, communication and financial considerations with the aim of building and strengthening resilience amid a changing business ecosystem.

The reviews are undertaken as part of the change management process to implement structural changes to improve and facilitate cash flow and install innovative and state-of-the-art technologies.

As industries are reorienting and diversifying, they are also expanding the scope of their cooperation across borders to better adapt to the changing global supply and demand shock.

Due to Covid-19, the situation is becoming more challenging as more countries are now looking inward. Understandably, it is to sustain the growth of their own export market.

Supporting local businesses

Given these impending issues, government policy needs to focus on supporting local businesses to enable them to restrategise, revamp and remodel based on the global shift in consumer markets, investment and trade.

It is important to identify new global markets.

There is a need to start working on investments and trade in new areas of future growth while strengthening their market presence to stay relevant.

After decades of focusing on the electrical and electronics (E&E) sector, emphasis should be on growing new areas like health, medical device manufacturing, digital technology and halal food industries.

The energy sector has proven its resilience and adaptability in dealing with the unprecedented challenges of the past few months.

Covid-19 has been an enabler to innovation in the energy sector.

Innovation in the energy sector is not limited to developments in technology, but also encompasses innovation in contracts, business models, decision making and the diversification of portfolios.

Firms and governments need to rethink to ensure resilience in global supply chains following the impact of Covid-19.

For some, they argue for supply chains to be re-nationalised, or at least shortened, to reduce risks from global exposure. Firms may also need to rethink sourcing decisions, resulting in re-ordering of global production, with potentially far-reaching implications, especially for developing countries.

The government will need to reconsider the list of strategic goods for which there is a requirement for domestic production, or impose new sourcing constraints on businesses.

It must also revisit the procurement practices, consider the trade and investment policy environment that can best support resilience like digital infrastructure to improve productivity or improvements to trade facilitation practices to minimise scope for disruptions related to face-to-face processes.

The government may need to consider special arrangements for specific supply chains for strategic goods. However, this should not necessarily be equated with a reshoring of production.

Creating successful environment, social and governance (ESG) policies and strategies are essential. ESG investing will be big in the post-Covid-19 era. It is a wake-up call for all businesses as it has been revealed that global markets and supply chains are fragile and easily disrupted. This will result in an increased focus on sustainability. ESG integration helps to reduce risks as well as capture business opportunities linked to the transition to a more sustainable economy.

There is also a need to emphasise on market presence and reputation. Goods and services offered by companies need to stand out. Having a strong market reputation would help businesses gain the edge over the competition and ensure growth as well as sustainability.

Policies need to be designed to help businesses develop market presence and reputation to help determine their growth and secure a niche space in the market. It is important to take note that businesses in future will not be what they used to be.

In short, there is a need to change and adapt to the new business ecosystem, as especially with the disruption of global supply value chains. Policies and strategies should be drawn to strengthen economic and business cooperation with partner countries in an “innovative” way.

Anthony Dass is group chief economist/head, AmBank Research; adjunct professor, UNE, Australia; and a member of the Economic Action Council. The views expressed here are the writer’s own.

The Star backed company with questionable past for Silterra

$
0
0

Someone bumped into a Tan Sri CEO of a renown Public Listed Company. He was fuming with Khazanah Nasional. Apparently, Khazanah invited them to submit a proposal to merge with an entity, they repeatedy failed to turnaround. 

He was at the top of his voice ignoring passer-by over-hearing him. 

"They asked me to submit proposal. When netizen and public whack me on social media, they kept quiet. Now I look bad. I could have just focused on my investments abroad!" 

That is not an isolated case of unethical practise by former EPF CEO and now new CEO of Khazanah, Dato Shahril Ridza Ridzuan. Someone with an orang putih temperament should have been more fussy over ethics. 

The Silterra deal turned out to be another case of Khazanah inviting proposals, but subsequently chugged aside ethics when foreigners submitted proposals after the deadline. It is fair to suspect details from earlier submitted proposals leaked. 

The son of a great man in Malaysia's early history lamented, "There is no more nation builder, bro." True enough, a government entity like Khazanah is pursuing money and putting aside nation building like unscrupulous investment banker, Gordon Gekko in the movie Wall Street. 

No wonder they invited a company investigated by MACC to submit a proposal?

Race heats up

Silterra is one of the few front-end player in the local Malaysian semiconductor industry and it is indeed an important ingredient for nation building in the said industry.  

There are only two locals invited, wonder why, namely; Dagang Nexchange Berhad (Dnex) and Green Packet before Taiwan's Foxcomm and Germany's X-Tab were invited after the deadline. 

Naturally, media were giving coverage to the bidders and a local Chinese paper, believed to be Sin Chew Jit Poh, backed Foxcomm. The Star, NST and Berita Harian backed for local as it serves to sustain the local electronic industry. [Read in our September 18th posting here]. 

Few days ago, The Star seemed to back Green Packet with their glowing appraisal of the new bid submitted:

Sources familiar with the ongoing developments said the tech firm Green Packet put in two offers last month, an updated binding offer of US$62.5mil assuming the equity conditions were retained and US$81.2mil in an alternative binding offer, if the equity conditions were removed

Race for Silterra heats up

TECHNOLOGY

Wednesday, 04 Nov 2020

By ROYCE TAN

PETALING JAYA: A new bid by Green Packet Bhd has turned up the heat on the ongoing tussle for Silterra Sdn Bhd, Khazanah Nasional Bhd’s loss-making chip manufacturer.

Sources familiar with the ongoing developments said the tech firm put in two offers last month, an updated binding offer of US$62.5mil assuming the equity conditions were retained and US$81.2mil in an alternative binding offer, if the equity conditions were removed.

How this came about was after Khazanah allegedly shifted the goalpost by opening up the bids to foreign investors, which saw two firms coming in with big bucks to compensate for their failure to meet the local equity criteria, turning the Silterra sale into a whole new ball game.

Taiwanese semiconductor giant Foxconn was said to have ascribed a US$125mil enterprise value for Silterra, of which it would pay US$87.5mil for a 70% stake.

German-based group of semiconductor foundries X-Fab put in a less attractive offer of US$70mil, but was still better than the initial offers by Green Packet and Dagang Nexchange Bhd (DNeX) at US$56.8mil and US$32.7mil respectively.


The equity conditions set by the International Trade and Industry Ministry (Miti) and the Malaysian Investment Development Authority (Mida) required Silterra’s manufacturing plant to be majority local-owned, while foreign participation can only be in minority stakes.

It was clearly spelt out that Siltera had to maintain its equity structure of 55% local, out of which 30% has to be of bumiputra status while the foreign shareholding is up to a maximum of the remaining 45%.

It is learnt that Green Packet and DNeX were told to update their bids after Khazanah extended the tender from its earlier deadline of July 31 to Oct 9 and they were told to assume that the equity condition was removed and Khazanah could retain up to 30%.

Sources said in Green Packet’s latest bid, if the equity conditions were retained, its offer of US$62.5mil includes US$5.7mil for 10% free shares to a Malaysia Inc special-purpose vehicle (SPV) as a as strategic minority shareholder to safeguard national interest in the electrical and electronics (E&E) sector.

“The government can decide if it wants to give the 10% to Mida, Khazanah or the Science, Technology and Innovation Ministry (Mosti).

“This is to allow the government to continue exercising its influence to ensure continuous support towards the local semiconductor and E&E sectors,” sources said, adding that this arrangement would lead to an effective local ownership of 59.5% with an effective bumiputra ownership of 37.2%.

In Green Packet’s alternative binding offer of US$81.2mil, assuming the foreign ownership control is lifted, sources said the group has proposed that Khazanah retain a 20% stake in Silterra.

Over time, Green Packet’s foreign partner Orient Excellent, which expressed its commitment to fully fund Silterra’s future capital expenditure requirements, will result in a foreign-majority shareholder roster. [More news on the tie-up in Edge Online here]

Out of the 80%, Green Packet will eventually hold 43.8% while Orient Excellent – a private equity fund which has China’s Finance Ministry and National Social Security Fund as among its shareholders – will hold the other 56.2%.


The effective local ownership here is expected to be 55%, with an effective bumiputra stake of 39.3%.

It is said that the investment by Green Packet will be made through the RM500mil BumiTech Fund, a private equity fund which aims to support the growth of late-stage high technology companies owned by bumiputra entrepreneurs to upscale, expand local and global networks and eventually export technology products and services.

Sources also said what Green Packet had in store for Silterra would be the access to a large network of semiconductor companies such as its collaboration partner Huaqiang Group, which owns the largest distributor of semiconductor components in China, and Konka, a leading electronic conglomerate, also in China.

Silterra will also be the key element in building the Asia SemiCon Hub, the largest semiconductor industrial park in the country which aimed to attract up to RM68bil in investments and create more than 500,000 new jobs over the next 30 years, said the source.

Meanwhile, those with knowledge of the deal said there were chances that Green Packet might not want to take up the Silterra offer after December or January.

This was due to the emergence of newer semiconductor wafer plants in China that were looking at kicking off production in the second half of next year or by 2022.

“If Khazanah doesn’t sell it before that, I don’t think they can get any buyers in the future.

“This is the fourth time they are trying to sell Silterra and this will also be the last time, ” the source said.

And the main reason why the first three deals did not go through was because the only buyers interested were foreign companies.

“The lifting of the equity conditions in terms of foreign ownership is not within Khazanah’s authority.

“Over the last three times when they wanted to sell Silterra, Mida also did not approve, because it felt that Siltera was a vital component of the whole E&E ecosystem up north, ” sources said, adding that without Silterra, it will put a dent on the country’s foreign direct investment (FDI).

The source also warned of a huge political issue if Silterra was sold to Foxconn, as its founder and chairman Terry Gou had run for Taiwanese presidency before.

Gou moved quite a number of its Foxconn manufacturing plants from China to Vietnam in his 2019 presidential bid.

“There is a potential political liability for Malaysia as a small country to stand between a potential conflict between Foxconn and mainland China.

“If we let go of Silterra, a national strategic asset to Foxconn, it will kill the future of Silterra, ” sources said.

Green Packet past irregularties

The new bid by Green Packet in Siltera will be made through a RM500 million Private Equity Fund, BumiTech Fund. 

Is there really a Bumiputera participation in management and shareholder? Is the private fund purely a pass through entity or fund backed by Teraju? 

If it is Teraju backed, then an agency establised to assist Bumiputera should not be competing with genuine and capable Bumiputera entrepreneurs to merely name lending but offer no added value. It is an often heard complain of government and state agencies meant to assist Bumiputera entrepreneur from time immemorial.    

The issue of Bumiputera substantive involvement is more so now that Khazanah and the 10% to the SPV will be dormant partners that likely would or could be interested only in once a year annual report. Given time and opportunity, they could sell it out to even foreigners entirely.

Second question on Green Packet is on their integrity. This takes us to a past report in Malaysia Reserve below:
MACC investigates possible irregularities in P1 acquisition
Monday, July 1st, 2019 at , News

Under the 2014 deal, TM acquired a 57% stake in the wireless broadband service provider for RM350m

by AZREEN HANI / pic by ARIF KARTONO

THE Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) is investigating whether there are irregularities in Telekom Malaysia Bhd’s (TM) 2014 acquisition of wireless services company Packet One Networks (M) Sdn Bhd (P1). 

Under the deal, the government-linked company acquired a 57% stake in the wireless broadband service provider for RM350 million with a further RM210 million capital injection via newly issued redeemable bonds.

Presently, TM owns 72.9% of the wireless operator — the brand name of which had undergone numerous changes from P1, to “webe”, and now to “unifi”. 

But the 2014 acquisition of the capital-intensive business has tailed TM’s profits. The telecommunications operator posted its first quarterly loss in 10 years during the third quarter of last year (3Q18), with impairment provisions ballooning to RM934 million including for assets related P1. 

Three sources confirmed with The Malaysian Reserve (TMR) that the visit by MACC officers to the telecommunications company on June 13 this year was related to P1 acquisition.

TM had confirmed the visit by MACC officers to the company’s headquarters, stressing in an email reply to TMR that the visit was to “seek certain information”.

One source told TMR that a few individuals are being probed over the half-billion ringgit deal for possible irregularities. But nobody has been charged for any wrongdoing. It is believed that the report to the MACC was recommended by the company’s board. 

TM in an emailed statement said: “We will continue extending our cooperation to the MACC as needed.” 

One of the sources said the inquiry into the P1 acquisition had delayed the appointment of a new CEO.

The company had been without a permanent head for about a year after the resignation of MD/group CEO Datuk Seri Mohammed Shazalli Ramly. Some parties previously claimed that interference from Putrajaya had delayed the appointment of the CEO.

Last month, the company announced the appointment of Datuk Noor Kamarul Anuar Nuruddin as its new MD, group CEO and ED, ending months of speculations on who would lead the telecommunications company. Imri Mokhtar was the acting CEO before Noor Kamarul’s appointment and will resume his role as the COO of the group.

Rosli Man was appointed as chairman, effective Dec 3, 2018. He replaced Tan Sri Sulaiman Mahbob who resigned at the end of November 2018. Rosli, a seasoned practitioner in the sector, is seen as capable of steering the company out of its current rut.

Khazanah Nasional Bhd is a substantial shareholder in the company. 

The lack of progress and improvement for P1 continues to raise alarm — especially regarding the technology rollout of 4G when the industry is moving towards 5G, said another source. 

Issues at TM saw the firm shedding over RM14 billion in market value after its share price dropped from a high of around RM5 in May to a 52-week low of RM2.11. It was also removed from the main constituent of the benchmark Bursa Malaysia. 

However, its share price has recovered — closing last Friday’s trading at RM4 and valuing the company at RM15.03 billion. 

Its net profit for the first three months of this year rose to RM308.28 million from RM157.15 million recorded a year ago, boosting the company’s prospects.

But the company continues to feel the pressure to find a solution and resolve the issues faced by Streamyx customers. 

According to figures, there are 1.27 million Streamyx customers as at the end of last year and the company had upgraded 226,000 of these customers in areas covered by its fibre network.

The government wants the company to find a solution to resolve the problem faced by these customers. But the capital expenditure to move these customers to a faster network will cost a hefty sum. 

P1 was a loss-making company of Green Packet and the valuation of the P1-Telekom deal is viewed as quite excessive. Quote from a 2014 Edge Online editorial:

P1 is a loss-making company — based on Green Packet’s broadband operational losses of RM117 million — but it is earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (Ebitda) positive (financial year 2013 ended Dec 31 [FY13]: RM43 million) and generates Ebitda margin of 16%.

The group’s broadband unit generates average revenue per user (ARPU) of RM86 (as of 4QFY13) versus TM UniFi’s (its broadband service) ARPU of RM185 and Streamyx’ ARPU of RM85.

What we think could be the key rationale for the acquisition is as follows: First, the combination of P1’s 2.6GHz spectrum, which is suitable for high capacity traffic, and TM’s 2x5 MHz block in the 850MHz spectrum (lower spectrum entails much better frequency distance, which lowers capital expenditure for coverage) is a strong combination which gives it an advantage over incumbent cellular companies, which only have access to 1.8GHz and 2.6GHz spectrums for the 4G rollout.

Secondly, if TM intends to get into the 4G game in a big way, P1’s 449,000 subscribers will give it a meaningful base to start with. Thirdly, TM may also have access to P1’s 1,908 sites for the roll-out of its 4G network; the majority of P1’s sites would be in key cities versus TM’s Code Division Multiple Access or CDMA sites in rural areas.

But two key questions remain. First, the valuation of the deal, rumoured at an implied value of RM2 billion, is quite excessive. The second question is whether an acquisition of a stake is the most efficient way to gain access to P1’s spectrum.

Who was the passenger in the deal? 

With such a questionable deal in the past, can Green Packet be expected to play a pivotal role for the local semiconductor industry or merely quick buck Chinaman artist?

The past is an indication.

Reliable local and Bumiputera

With the local content, local shareholding structure, financing in place and technically capable outfit, Dnex present a more professional and reliable option as NST summarised below:
   
The proposal from DNeX and its strategic partner Beijing CGP Investment Co Ltd (Beijing CGP) was focused on planning and executing SilTerra's turnaround with a total investment of RM846 million, according to a source.

On top of a RM136 million cash payment for Khazanah, DNex and its partner will absorb SilTerra's RM210 million bank borrowings, and inject a total of RM500 million for its capital and operating expenditures.

Khazanah was not available for comment when contacted by last week.

Meanwhile, sources said the condition of Silterra's present manufacturing licence would not be reviewed if SilTerra remains in the local hands.

"SilTerra under DNex will be in capable Bumiputera hands with a Chinese giant as partner. If Green Packet is picked, SilTerra will still be in local hands but its founder (Puan Chan Cheong) will be second time lucky with Khazanah," they said, referring to Green Packet's disposal of its 57 per cent stake in Packet One Networks (M) Sdn Bhd to Khazanah's subsidiary Telekom Malaysia Bhd in 2014," they said.

NST is saying Khazanah will be giving Green Packet another free ride again. Not mentioned is Green Packet will likely flip the company to foreigners using the complicated corporate structure put in place to merely qualify for bidding. 

Perhaps, MACC should put this deal under its watch. 

Of late, key transactions and projects of GLCs and GLIC tend to favour non-Bumiputera companies when GLCs and GLICs by right should uphold their responsibilities to provide opportunities for Bumiputera companies. 

This trend can be seen in such transactions as FGV buying over non-Bumi plantations, EPF and SP Setia dealings, and recently proposed merger of Eco World and UEM Sunrise. 

Perikatan Nasional need to end this reverse discrimination against Bumiputera companies carried over from the Pakatan Harapan government. Just save the time and hustle, go for Dnex for genuine bumiputera, high integrity and ensured local benefit. 

Green Packet's Bumi deception to takeover Silterra

$
0
0
Ali Baba company of Ali front but Baba behind?

Prime Minister, Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin managed to pass through two major hurdles and his premiership seemed secured for the time being. Since the budget has sailed through, Board of Directors of Khazanah Nasional should be politically secured to meet and deliberate on the Silterra sales pending for approval.

Failing which, it means the political move to oust Muhyiddin is not over. Any sensitive member of the Board knows a wrong decision could terminate their corporate career. If there is any wrongdoing, they could be subjected to latter day investigation.

The budget presentation to parliament, the ensuing debate and its’s passing last Thrsday took up the media attention for the last two weeks as it may have placed Muhyiddin’s government in quite a predicament. 

Now that it is over, for the time being at least, it is timely to relook at the Silterra sales issue again. The talk of selling Silterra to foreigners have not been taken well by netizens. [Read portal MyKMU, blog Captain M, and TV Online.]  Dato Najib too touched on the Silterra sale in his FB. 

If netizen aggresive demand to allow for EPF withdrawal to tide rakyat's financial constraint is any indication, Khazanah may need to take heed of their concern.

Dnex versus Green Packet


Putting aside foreign budders Foxcomm and X-Tab, the local bidders are Dnex vs Green Packet.

Dnex was the local owned company invited to plan for Silterra turnaround. They were invited with the plan for takeover and turnaround of Siltera since three years ago.  

The decision to invite them may have arised from their past success as a Bumiputera company that successfully tookover Dagang Net subsidiary out of Time Engineering Berhad hand, then held by Khazanah.

DNeX was the sole interested party and strongly encouraged by Khazanah.  There detailed due diligence done and a comprehensive turnaround plan working with Firdaus (CEO) and the senior management were put forward.

They brought in a strong Chinese partner and secured contracted off-take from our partners investee companies that could increase Silterra capacity utilisation from 50% to 85%. Serious capital of RM 500 million be deployed to fix Silterra manufacturing issues. 

Term sheet approved by Khazanah with a view to sign SPA within 2-4 weeks early this year. Then new bidders like Foxconn or GreenPacket appeared in the bidding process in 1Q 2020 after the final scheme with bid offer is known to the whole Khazanah board and organization. 

After much effort made, millions spent, and the benefit of knowledge from the technical and financial proposal plan of Dnex, the conveniently unprofessional and unethical Khazanah management decided to change the goalpost to invite other bidders, including latter dates invited foreign bids.

This severely put Dnex at a serious disadvantage as its plan and numbers would likely have leaked. It is easier for competitors with the benchmark available to up the numbers and better the terms. Their initiative was definitely hijacked and probably stolen by some members of Khazanah board.  

If Dnex did not improve on their bid, their plan remained the more serious effort by a local to develop a local ecosystem that will benefit the local semiconductor industry.

It could efficiently grow from the current industry segment and without reinventing the wheel and wasteful resources employed.

Dnex’s Bumiputera shareholders, management and staff is an attractive criteria and advantage in view of the intended emphasis in Muhyiddin’s budget to return and revive the Bumiputera economy.

Bumiputera deception


It may have been anticipated by Green packet that they launched and promoted their BumiTech Fund initiative with a Singapore-based Private Equity firm, GP Kendall Equity Capital

[The Star news report dated November 12, 2020 is reproduced below as Appendix].

Green Packet is a partner and contributed RM100 million into the RM500 million Fund, which claimed is meant to “support the growth of bumiputra-run, late stage high-tech companies” and emphasise “value-accretive” or in other word, their presence could enable the company to go IPO.

BumiTech Fund, is not a Bumiputera fund, but participating in potential Bumiputera company as “substantial minority stakes with strong minority shareholder rights including board representation”.

It means the deceptively named Fund could control the Bumiputera company till they exit or if financially profitable, take larger control of the company at a latter day when it is conveniently and politically acceptable. 

Silterra will be turned into transitory company typically described locally as Ali Baba company, which is basically Ali Bumiputera facade with a "Baba Nyonya" at the back controlling the wheels.

Green Packet's reviewed proposal to Khazanah Nasional is believed to involve Khazanah and another government entity having a significant minority presence. 

Together with BumiTech Fund, which is obviously not Bumiputera, the combined equity could give the elusion of majority ownership are Bumiputera.

However, Khazanah or the government entity are not Bumiputera company but government owned entities. The PH experience proves government companies could foresake Bumiputera agenda upon change in government. 

If government as represented by Khazanah’s Board agrees to Green Packet structure, it is a betrayal to Muhyiddin’s own policy and the so-called Shared Prosperity initiative.

Political warchest?


The deal structure by Green Packet leads to their questionable past dealing with one of Khazanah company, namely Telekom Malaysia.


Once lost to Green Packet, Silterra will lose the social agenda attached to it and come exit time, the lesser the bother. 

Under Pakatan Harapan, government undertook a massive sales of asset. The prevailing suspicion then was that there were massive kickback for the then ruling parties to build up their political war chest. 

Any government asset sales these days are conveniently made at deep discount and in a hurry thus making the sales looked dubious and attract similar suspicion.

Green Packet is involved in a bid and their bid are supposed to be confidential. It should not be disclosed to the public.

Yet they are doing aggressive self promotion and churning news on mainstream media (Star and Sundaily) and several financial and techie media - Stockbit, Digital News Asia and FinTech News

Such exuberance to compromise ethics does raise eyebrows as to why Khazanah does not care. The manner Khazanah change goalpost on Dnex too raise eyerbrows.  

Public, netizen and authority should open their ears and eyes to the manovering of Goh Ching Yin and elitist attitude of CEO Dato Shahril Ridza Redhuan.

--------------------------- 
 
Appendix:


Star Exclusive - Bumi tech firm potential unleashed


By ROYCE TAN

CORPORATE NEWS

Thursday, 12 Nov 2020

PETALING JAYA: Taking the road less travelled, an upcoming private equity (PE) fund is aiming to support the growth of bumiputra-run, late stage high-tech companies in what seems to be untapped investment opportunities.

Plans were underway for Green Packet Bhd to roll out a RM500mil BumiTech Fund through a general partner setup with Singapore-based PE firm Kendall Court, which will be known as GP Kendall Capital Partners.

Green Packet executive director Tan Kay Yen (pic below) said the fund would be looking primarily at bumiputra companies because of the abundant opportunities.


“It’s in the bumiputra space where we feel that there’s an opportunity for public private collaboration.

“This is where we come in in terms of funding support, fostering joint ventures (JVs) and consortiums and then providing the company with the technical know-hows and capital, ” he told StarBiz.

It seemed timely after the Presidential election in the United States, as the world heads towards the decoupling of the United States and China.

A Joe Biden administration would not defuse the ongoing trade tension between the two countries and experts across the globe believed that the rivalry of the two economic giants may intensify as far as technology is concerned.

The only consolation is, Biden is expected to be less confrontational than Donald Trump, who waged the economic war with China in 2018.

With this plot setting the economic tone over the medium to longer term, South-East Asia and Malaysia are expected to continue benefiting from the unabating conflict which will see more companies diversifying their locations.

Tan said the objective of the BumiTech Fund was to push the companies to upscale, expand their local and global networks and eventually export their technology product and services, which will be vital in line with the exponential growth of IR4.0.



Among the benefits for the bumiputra entrepreneurs would be the upgrading of skill sets, employment opportunities for high-skilled jobs, improving productivity and profitability and to venture into overseas markets. Data from CB Insights showed that investment into the technology space has grown three-fold from 2013 to 2019 and is expected to grow by another three fold between 2020 and 2025.

Most of the investments, around 54%, come in at the seed or angel funding stage and as it moves down towards series C, D and E+, the investments start to taper off.

This is understandable as investors would want to hop on the early ride and when it burns, it would not be that severe.

“They don’t burn off so much money because the early stages don’t require large volumes of investment.

“And this is where we saw an opportunity and why the fund is tailored to focus on the late stage, ” he said.

Tan said the late stage companies could either be small listed companies or unlisted companies, because the number of listed bumiputra companies against the total listed companies was not balanced.

This presented opportunities to bring the private companies to an initial public offering (IPO).

For context, 212 out of 959 listed companies in Malaysia are tech-based companies while 203,593 or 15% of non-listed companies play in the tech space.

Out of the 212 listed companies, only 18.5% are bumiputra-controlled.

“They are profitable but they are not at the size that you can go for IPOs or their market is only local. There’s no regional story.

“There is still a lot of growth in the late-stage companies. It’s not that they don’t have the ability, it’s the complacency, ” Tan explained.

Being a limited partner, Green Packet is committing up to 20% or RM100mil to the BumiTech fund, the first of many funds under the general partner setup.

The fund is also soliciting commitments from a select group of public and private sector investors who have strategic or commercial interest in Malaysia’s technology segment and those who are geared to capitalise on the “early mover advantage” to capture attractive opportunities.

Other limited partners have also voiced their commitments to park money into the fund, such as the Chinese PE fund Orient Excellent, state-owned central financial enterprise China Orient Asset Management and electronic conglomerates Konka and Huaqiang Group.

The BumiTech fund is looking at around eight to 10 investments at RM50mil to RM80mil each.

In ensuring optimal diversification of the fund’s portfolio, Tan said investments for single projects would be no larger than 20% of the fund size, a maximum of 25% for a particular sector and not more than 25% for overseas business, to ensure that the investments remain Malaysia-focused.

“Why so? Because we want to bring these guys overseas, that’s one of the agenda.

“Green Packet, being a tech company, concentrate on certain areas but we have the opportunities from overseas technology partners that want us to utilise their technology for the Malaysian market or regional expansions.

“We have all these partnerships that we can bring to the investee companies ourselves, ” said Tan.

The BumiTech Fund will primarily invest in substantial minority stakes with strong minority shareholder rights including board representation.

It may also selectively consider acquiring majority stakes in partnership with experienced operators or management teams.

It will also generally invest in the capacity of a value-accretive strategic investor wherein it can provide pro-active assistance towards business development, operational know-hows, effective management and sound governance of its investee companies.

Tan planned to have the first close of the entire fund towards the first quarter of 2021 and the company is also doing due diligence on a few companies that the fund has set its eyes on.

One of its first major investments would be in chipmaker Silterra, should Green Packet be successful in acquiring it from Khazanah Nasional Bhd.

StarBiz had reported that Green Packet had updated its binding offer of US$62.5mil for the company, assuming the equity conditions were retained and US$81.2mil in an alternative binding offer, if the equity conditions were removed.

The portion of Green Packet’s investment will come from the BumiTech Fund.

Viewing all 1576 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>